Punxsutawney Phil said:Like pretty much everyone else in the football community at the time, I expected us to beat the Suns who had yet to win a game.
I expected that with finals still a possibility they would have a crack from the get go and not be roused from their slumber by a blast from the coach at half time. I expected the coach and players to have enough smarts to be able to protect a 10 point lead with 46 seconds left.
I expected that even with a depleted side the players we still had in the side would be good enough to win, just has we had beaten Melbourne the week before with effectively the same team minus Maric. The same Melbourne who came out and toyed with the Suns a few weeks later.
I obviously set the bar way too high. Still if you don't get disappointed with performances like that, then thats your prerogative.
rosy23 said:I expected us to beat GC. Our team wasn't a lot different to the one that got the points over Melbourne the week before. We were certainly in a position to win the game but, for whatever reason, we let ourselves down. The cynics suspected Ivan was rested...maybe he was injured maybe not. Similar to the Sandilands situation...we'll never know. I didn't necessarily expect us to play finals. I have belief every year that we will but would never out my house on it. With hindsight a few things done differently and we could possibly have played finals. I don't think it's overly unrealistic to dream of what could have been. People from RFC who knew the shape of our list and the ability of our players better than any of us certainly discussed us playing finals as though we had a decent chance. It was also a core ingredient in our 3-0-75 plan.
TheCan said:Hey rosy, question to 3-0-75 plan...if we dont make the 8 next year, does Gale follow hardwick out the door?
Disco08 said:Reckon the fact they only expected two top 4 finishes in the 3 finals appearances they were aiming for shows they knew we were only a going to be borderline top 8 this year. If Vickery, Grimes and Foley stay fit there's no doubt we would have played finals IMO.
linuscambridge said:Sorry to break the news to you Phil, but there have always and will always be games that severely disappoint you whether you barrack for the Tigers, or any other side. How happy do you think North were to get over run by Port Adelaide earlier is year? That makes the Tigers capitulation against the Suns looked tepid by comparison.
rosy23 said:Stupid question as far as I'm concerned. I haven't thought, suggested or implied DH will exit Punt Road, let alone Benny go with him but to answer your question neither will get the boot if we don't play finals next year.
TheCan said:fair enough, so we dont take ownership or be held accountable for plans not delivered. no problem.
Punxsutawney Phil said:Yet we were good enough to come back from a 6 goal defecit to lead by 3 goals with 10 minutes remaining, and were also good enough to lead by 10 points with 46 seconds left on the clock, yet we should have not expected to win that game?
It took a goal after the siren following 46 seconds of complete ineptitude for us to lose, and you can't understand how anyone expected anything different? And people who expected a win that day have no idea whatsoever?
And some people reckon Hardwick is the king of spin!
Dear lord.
:hihijb03 said:This too. Good post Phil/Jukes.
With a risk of confusing metaphors Patsy's flowersniffing on this thread has soared into the stratosphere.
Disco08 said:Reckon the fact they only expected two top 4 finishes in the 3 finals appearances they were aiming for shows they knew we were only a going to be borderline top 8 this year. If Vickery, Grimes and Foley stay fit there's no doubt we would have played finals IMO.
I agree.rosy23 said:Stupid question as far as I'm concerned. I haven't thought, suggested or implied DH will exit Punt Road, let alone Benny go with him but to answer your question neither will get the boot if we don't play finals next year.
3-0-75 is not the plan, it is the anticipated result of the plan. The plan that was done was an enormous overhaul of the football club and included targets and KPI's for everyone from the bootstudder to the President. It included debt reduction, administration, facilities and the football department inclusive of recruiting, fitness, coaching and playing. The plan said that if we meet all these KPI's the result should be 3-0-75.TheCan said:fair enough, so we dont take ownership or be held accountable for plans not delivered. no problem.
Punxsutawney Phil said:Like pretty much everyone else in the football community at the time, I expected us to beat the Suns who had yet to win a game.
I expected that with finals still a possibility they would have a crack from the get go and not be roused from their slumber by a blast from the coach at half time. I expected the coach and players to have enough smarts to be able to protect a 10 point lead with 46 seconds left.
I expected that even with a depleted side the players we still had in the side would be good enough to win, just has we had beaten Melbourne the week before with effectively the same team minus Maric. The same Melbourne who came out and toyed with the Suns a few weeks later.
I obviously set the bar way too high. Still if you don't get disappointed with performances like that, then thats your prerogative.
graystar1 said:Have a look at the RFC website to see what I mean. Yes, he has to be positive, but results are what counts, not words of spin. By any means, 2012 has been yet another disappointing year. No finals again, and this was the year we were supposed to roar. With due respect, this is Dimmas 3rd. year with us and still no finals appearances. Every year we think this is the year to shine, but it just does not happen. 2013??? Who knows? The list has to be trimmed yet again, and it is a worry that the Coburg team is so low, with not much to offer there. So where do we get players to get us into the eight next year?
Instead of spin words from DH, maybe some positives about what we are looking for in the way of players for '13. Another good ruckman, some skilled backs and a decent CHF for starters. That is what I would like to hear from the coach and club.
jb03 said:This too. Good post Phil/Jukes.
With a risk of confusing metaphors Patsy's flowersniffing on this thread has soared into the stratosphere.
Punxsutawney Phil said:Not disagreeing with any of that linus. We all know, as Richmond supporters, what it is like to lose the "unlosable" game.
Doesn't mean that I have to accept some of the excuses being wheeled out by Disco though. I am sure North supporters didn't come out after that debacle and make ridiculous claims like "anyone who expected anything different has no idea".
That side against the Suns was essentially the same as the side that beat Melbourne the week before, minus Ivan Maric. And because the loss of one good player we have gone from a side capable of comfortably beating a cellar dweller to one who isn't good enough to beat any AFL side? And yet we were good enough to overcome a 6 goal deficit and get to a lead of 3 goals in just 2 quarters. How did that happen with such a sh!t side?
Ridiculous.
We need to rename this thread I think.
Disco08 said:You don't think the loss of Ivan (when we're already missing Tyrone) and any form of ruck competitiveness can make a fair difference to our already average performance?
I'm not excusing the loss. I'm saying our team was crap and deserved to lose. See the difference?