Missing33 said:His name is stupid.
What exactly is missing apart from the obvious?
Missing33 said:His name is stupid.
TIGEREXTRA said:Saw the new Hulk movie.
Great movie
4/5
evo said:'Michael Clayton' --some might find it a little slow paced but i thought it was excellent 8.5/10.Good value Clooney.
rosy23 said:Did anyone enjoy Valentine's Day on the ABC on Sunday night? It was based on a footy team in Rushworth. It would hardly feature at the Oscars but I reckon it was wonderful. A bit of light hearted fun. It's a pity Aussie film makers don't get good funding these days because a lot of talent is going to waste.
rosy23 said:Did anyone enjoy Valentine's Day on the ABC on Sunday night? It was based on a footy team in Rushworth. It would hardly feature at the Oscars but I reckon it was wonderful. A bit of light hearted fun. It's a pity Aussie film makers don't get good funding these days because a lot of talent is going to waste.
RoyceHart said:I quite liked it Rosy. Nothing that made you think too much but good fun.
I wonder when they shot it? The rainy days for the games was interesting as we haven't had too many of them!
rosy23 said:I'm not so sure jb. The Australian Film C(whatever they're called) have bemoaned the fact they aren't funded anymore to make the mini-series that used to feature on the ABC in years gone by. There were some wonderful ones. Changi and Brides of Christ are 2 that come to mind. Not so much movies as such I suppose but the talent is obviously there to make movies if they were funded more. I'd certainly be happy for my 8 cents a day to be used for that purpose.
jb03 said:Interesting point. We have made some outstanding TV shows but few outstanding movies. Not sure why that is.
tigertim said:Movies I've seen over the last week or 2:
Get Smart: so much promise so little return. You have to play Smart as Maxwell Smart was in the tv series, no room for "interpretations". So Carells "softening" didn't cut it for me. Smart wasn't bumbling enough or sharp enough.