How can they be so inconsistent with adjudicating this stuff again.
So Hewett and Neale are wrestling, Hewett hits Neale high (in the throat), Neale retaliates by punching Hewett in the stomach.
Hewett - CARELESS conduct, low impact, high contact
Neale - INTENTIONAL conduct, low impact, body contact
Both get $2,500 fines. How is that right, how can Neales be regarded as intentional but Hewetts isn't? Its so contrived, but yet again, like the incidents with Grimes and the 50's yesterday, you get this sort of stuff where the incidents are basically the same time, same act, but treated differently.