rosy23 said:How often has a defender won the award? I think the voting is weighted towards midfielders/forwards but could be wrong.
shawry said:We are too biased here and most probably dont watch a lot of Port games. Pearce is no doubt talented and I would havebeen happy if either he, Raines or Murphy won it.
KB gave Shaw 5 votesGhost Who Walks said:The NAB judging panel has as much creditability as the tribunal.
How can they all pick Pearce, obviously would not know a decent player if it fell on them.
Yep, very true. It's a subjective thing I suppose. I've thought about whether I'm being biased or not and I don't think I am. But cest la vie. It's ok to disagree with the experts sometimes.mb64 said:Not many of the judges agree with you Hopper.hopper said:Sorry, but I reckon this decision is a load of rubbish. Pearce's skills are pretty average. Sure, he has plenty going for him, but I didn't think his season overall was up to Raines' standards.
Sure is,I was surprised at how easily Pearce won it.hopper said:Yep, very true. It's a subjective thing I suppose. I've thought about whether I'm being biased or not and I don't think I am. But cest la vie. It's ok to disagree with the experts sometimes.mb64 said:Not many of the judges agree with you Hopper.hopper said:Sorry, but I reckon this decision is a load of rubbish. Pearce's skills are pretty average. Sure, he has plenty going for him, but I didn't think his season overall was up to Raines' standards.
CptJonno2Madcow2005 said:Like i have said it should have went this way:
1-Murphy
2-Thomas
3-Pearce
4-Raines
5-Shaw