Narkle

[Little Ziggyadee]

Sign him up will love playing under dimma with Bolton & the Riolis
Delisted player for free on Friday $160K

 

[MD Jazz]

No thanks

 

[T-Shirt Tommy]

No.

 

[Redford]

No.

 

[Ian4]

yes for mine. we need more small forwards

 

[tigerman]

No for me, Juddy Clarke needs to play.

 

[mrposhman]

No thanks. Slow. Theres a reason Geelong changed to a quicker style and he wasn't part of it. Also, with Selwood retiring, they'd keep him if he was able to transition to that game style.

 

[MD Jazz]

yes for mine. we need more small forwards

Huh? Cumberland/Rioli/Clarke/Castagna. Narkle no improvement on any of those. And then we have Aarts still.

We don't need more small forwards, we need more Medium/tall forwards and mids.

 

[Redford]

Slow and timid.

 

[Tony Braxton-Hicks]

Lurks on the fringes waiting for the cheap possession. Not a Richmond Man.

 

[Leysy Days]

No.

 

[BiddiscombeSkills]

No thanks. If he played for the tiges, everyone would be expecting him to be delisted. As far as exposed form at VFL and AFL is concerned, Narkle isn’t fit to tie Aarts’ bootlaces.

 

[Rod]

Prefer Stack

 

[Little Ziggyadee]

Hey mods please close thread
The tribe has spoken

 

[TigerWinner]

Stengel says it all.

 

[waiting]

We were looking at him last year or the year before?

Or was that here say. ?

 

[Rod]

We were looking at him last year or the year before?

Or was that here say. ?

Rumour was last year but his manager Ralph Carr…. said it was garbage

Narkle poised to remain with Geelong

The midfielder could stay with the Cats.

www.sen.com.au

 

[artball]

Narkle? No-kle

 

[checkside]

yes for mine. we need more small forwards

He’s not a small forward

 

[BrisTiger24]

Saints fan on trade radio just called up and said if they miss out on De Goey, Narkle would be a good back up option