When the then VFL commissioned Waverley Park it did on based on the promises made by the then state government that a light rail line would be put in down that way, so people could be transported to the ground. From memory a rail line branch extension was also supposed to have been done, but like a lot of state governments before and since, nothing like that ever happened which is why the SE suburbs public transport infrastructure is *smile*, along with the rest of the state's.
Out of interest, what did it cost for the MCG redevelopment? Who paid for it, I bet the taxpayer whilst the MCC members just continued to sip on their G&T's, laughing all the way.
South Melbourne is not such a silly idea. Okay no rail line, but there was one close by, surely it could be reactivated and that's a good clean green idea that the government could actually promote and say they are doing something for the environment at the same time.
I reckon the AFL should have a hard look at Albert Park. Trams run up to Albert Park, bit of a walk like about a Km to the old Sth Melbourne oval. There is however a fair bit of car parking there, bars, good dining etc. Of course if the oval was to be redone, you'd have to have a ground that could hold at least 60 and ideally 70 Thousand to cover potential blockbusters. Now that would put Etihad out of business, Fremantle and West Coast, other interstate teams could just play there, who bloody cares. Meanwhile the Victorian Clubs could all play either at the MCG for expected 70,000 plus and finals, whilst Sth Melbourne covers the lesser Victorian club's rivally, leaving Etihad to swallow around with interstate clubs and interstate finals even.
One thing if Sth Melbourne got the nod, would a roof be a good idea or just have a smaller version of the G?