OFFICAL TEAM SHEET v saints R17 / Krak and Kella might miss [Merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

OFFICAL TEAM SHEET v saints R17 / Krak and Kella might miss [Merged]

gee theres alot of interesting developements goin on, admitidly most of them are unconfirmed as of yet, but still interesting none the less.
 
Tigers of Old said:
evo said:
Chaffey! Lord give me strength.

Agree, the Bell Hop ain't the answer.

Why bother promoting guys like Humm and Howat from the rookie list if they don't get an opportunity?
JON, Roach, anyone but the Bell Hop.

Chaffey and Rodan in the starting 22?

The terror the mind is conjouring :boxing
 
OK OK have your fun, BUT ...

if it's raining and we want some grunt, as well as some back up for Simmo, i wouldn't discount hall and Chaff as potentially good contributors.
 
If kella was going to miss would rather see mcguane come in except this time let him play on the 3rd tall unlike the sydney game.
 
I like the theory Ted Richards, but McGuane can't come in as he hasn't been named in the emergencies. Well he could (I think) but we would have to pay a fairly hefty fine for it.
 
TIGEREXTRA said:
Just given pain killing injections and play em. :P

I hope the match commitee is just playing guessing games with the oppossition.

Am hoping the same thing. Wasn't it a closed session? If so we could be spreading a few porkies.
 
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
TIGEREXTRA said:
Just given pain killing injections and play em. :P

I hope the match commitee is just playing guessing games with the oppossition.

Am hoping the same thing. Wasn't it a closed session? If so we could be spreading a few porkies.

Yeh, sounds like a few porkies going left,right,and centre.
 
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
The HS is saying Richo is doubtful:

Take no notice of the H/S. Listen to 8ty. ;D

You can't keep a good man down and the big fella will be out there today and probably really turn it on into the bargain. Go Matty. :clap
 
Re: Krak & Kellaway to probably miss

Gordietiger said:
the claw said:
isnt that great news no Krakouer. its a shame it takes an injury for the powers that be to drop him.

Forecast--rain,hail,wet at the MCG-perhaps you missed his performance just 3 weeks ago against Collingwood??-I've got it on video if you care to look
rain hail or shine a dud is a dud is a dud is a dud. get rid of him.
 
Another weather forecasting blunder..............where's the rain and hail ??

Look like Stafford will show his 200 next week and then say goodbye.
 
It is indeed a sad reflection of our playing list at present when after two weeks of posturing by the coach over the richo dilemma and that he is a better proposition than the 23rd ranked player on our list even though clearly struggliing with injury... that the inclusions today were chaffey ..hall and stafford .If these are really 23 24 &25 on our list the end of year surgery will need to be more severe than many are calling for!!
 
Kaelan said:
It is indeed a sad reflection of our playing list at present when after two weeks of posturing by the coach over the richo dilemma and that he is a better proposition than the 23rd ranked player on our list even though clearly struggliing with injury... that the inclusions today were chaffey ..hall and stafford .If these are really 23 24 &25 on our list the end of year surgery will need to be more severe than many are calling for!!

They are 23, 24 & 25 in order of current preference/form. Our best side (have we ever had it on the park?) has shown it is pretty reasonable but there is obviously a lack of real depth, despite most of our list having senior experience; one of the differences between genuinely good sides and the rest.