craig said:
In fact clubs such as Essendon will usurp us in regard to success and development of youth due to their acceptance of an ordinary season this year whilst developing kids which is what RFC should have done rather than finish 12 with a substandard side that will take the field again next season apart from the kids i am not getting too carried away. 8)
Out of interest I did a bit of research on that claim that a club like Essendon played young players at the expense of performance on the field and these are my results:
Age Ess Rich
18 1 player for 18 games 1 player for 22 games
19 4 for 44 6 for 42
20 5 for 35 3 for 13
21 2 for 13 1 for 6
22 5 for 72 1 for 20
23 5 for 48 3 for 61
On these stats we actually played 2 more players and the same number of games between 18-19 year olds. Up to the age of 21 we played one less player, however the number of games played gaps up. At 22-23 we are lacking players. I think this probably shows the damage done by the Frawley era but from what I can see this is being addressed satisfactorily.
I am very interested that you picked out Essendon as a team that has foresaken onfield performance for the experience of younger players. Essendon have of all teams have been one who have successfully over a long period of time managed to remain very competitive not because they played young players but because they maintained a balanced mix of young and old players and by bringing in the younger brigade sparingly rather than throwing them to the wolves. Essendon played 19 players this year between 23 and 27 years old. If that core couldnt do better then what they did this year, then you'd have to question Essendon's short-term future. Its gonna take a master stroke from the master coach, Sheedy, to make something happen quickly this time. I like the Tigers future a bit better at this stage.
Cheers
Great call, why do some people have to be negative all the time! Just acknowledge this one minor win.
Deledio v Roughhead-Win
Tambling v Franklin - Draw
Thursfield v Kirkby - Win
Secondly knowing how boards operate - CEOs have a 100% bigger impact on finances that Board Members!