GoodOne said:Tygrys said:Yes I'm very silly, for some strange reason I think a lower draft is actually on the basis of sheer logic actually a better draft pick. And I don't believe in throwing away a top ten draft pick to secure a dud (God as I read what I'm typing, I realise you're correct, I never realised what a fool I was!!!). I mean lets face it, everyone was cueing up to get rid of their top 10 draft picks, I just thank God we had as smooth an operator as Miller to get rid of ours for us! (they do have a habit of making draft day very suspenseful and exciting - personally I don't need that kind of tension!). And of course you are totally right about the type of player that 'we' all want. Another flanking on ball midget. I know I'll be spewing if we miss out out on one of them and we have to pick Thorpe or a Riewoldt instead. But no chance of that now though. Yep roll on draft day - I'm happy ;D
Im sure if it was 11th to 15th you'd be going on about giving up a Top 11 pick. Seriously!
At pick 8 we had a half a chance that one of the absolute elite (especially one of the talls) might slip through to us in the draft. At 13 we have buckleys chance. I still think that a top ten pick is a precious commodity...I guess I'm just funny that way...