Disco08 said:What chance one of the good hff's makes it to 30ish?
Mids: Swallow, Bennell, Gaff, Atley, Heppell, Caddy, Smith, Polec, Wallis, Parker, Hallahan (11)
Rucks: Gorringe, Lycett (2)
Forwards: Day, Darling, Lynch, Cook, Pitt, Harper, Lamb, Prestia (8)
Backs: Jacobs, Smedts, Harvey, McCarthy, Watson (5)
Is only 26 players. Are there others people can see breaking in there and giving us any chance at all of getting Lamb, Harper or even Pitt or is that just wishful thinking? Any out of place in that group and likely to go later?
Uncle said:Using the before mention pre-requisites Navy, what do you think of Josh Walker.
IMO he has gone under the radar a bit, moves well leads hard, is a good mark/kick
and looks the perfect size for a key forward.
Not sure where he lies within this draft but he is definately one I would like to see
in the yellow & black next year.
Disco08 said:Not sure Harry. Was actually wondering the same thing. It could mean the difference between 29 and something like 37 or 38.
Disco08 said:Yeah, I'm starting to agree with you spook. Seems like there's a good chance of getting a good mid with our second pick and also likely a few talls worth a spec later on.
spook said:We definitely have a need for a type like Eades Jimmeh. Looks better than Nahas to me - can keep his feet for a start.
Streak said:I wouldn't mind us getting a mid, but I'd actually rather get one with more defensive skills than the ability to run forward and kick a goal.
I think Collingwood showed you need a balance of midefielders between those that can run forward, and those that can play back (ideally both of course).
While we need more avenues to goal, I think we have neglected defensive midfield pressure in recent times.