Premiership Lists - what do they look like? | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Premiership Lists - what do they look like?

I always like looking at premiership lists that seem to be a bit different. The Sydney team of 2005 did not seem to be the usual up and coming team rising to high but more tended to be a team of toilers, season in season out. That's why I'd like to look at them now.

The Sydney 2005 list that went into that GF was:
<180 180-184 185-189 190-194 195-199 200+
Name Gms Name Gms Name Gms Name Gms Name Gms Name Gms
28+
Williams 292 Kirk 121 Nicks 175 Schauble 167 Ball 191
Barry 169 O'Loughlin 220
Hall 177
25-27 Crouch 180 Matthews 157 James 18 Goodes 159
Fosdike 114 N.Davis 128 C.Bolton 101
J.Bolton 137 Saddington 142
22-24 Maxfield 289 Fixter 27 Sundovist 9 Kennelly 99 R-Thomson 46 Doyle 40
Spriggs 69 L.Ablett 52 O'Keefe 91 Campbell 0 Jolly 70
Buchanan 46 Vogels 11
18-21 Schneider 50 Bevan 37 Malceski 5 Dempster 20 Shaw 0 Ericksen 0
Moore 5 McVeigh 33 Powell 8
Schmidt 0 Potter 0 Grundy 0
Clarke 0 Garrubba 0 M.Davis 0
Willoughby 0 Hayes 0

There are a number of factors in the Sydney team that bears interest:
1. That 7 players were over 27yo, a comparatively high number.
2. The high number of small to smaller medium players, <180 to 184cm.
3. The low number of taller mediums 185-189.
4. The large number of mobile talls, 190-194, and really talls, 200cm+.

The percentage crosstab is as follows:
Sydney 2005
<180 180-184 185-189 190-194 195-199 200+
28+ 2% 2% 4% 6% 0% 2%
25-27 4% 6% 2% 6% 0% 0%
22-24 4% 6% 2% 4% 6% 4%
18-21 11% 9% 2% 11% 2% 2%
Total 21% 23% 10% 27% 8% 8%

The interesting thing about the list is that it actually conforms to many of the parameters that we have identified with other premiership teams.

1. High percentage of smaller, youngish runners.
2. More experienced flankers.

North 1996
<180 180-184 185-189 190-194 195-199 200+
28+ 0% 10% 12% 2% 0% 0%
25-27 12% 2% 5% 5% 0% 0%
22-24 0% 7% 5% 7% 2% 0%
18-21 10% 2% 10% 7% 2% 0%
Total 22% 21% 32% 21% 4% 0%

Adelaide 1997
<180 180-184 185-189 190-194 195-199 200+
28+ 2% 2% 7% 0% 0% 2%
25-27 7% 5% 2% 7% 0% 2%
22-24 7% 10% 0% 7% 2% 2%
18-21 7% 5% 12% 2% 5% 0%
Total 21% 22% 21% 16% 7% 6%

What this also reinforces is that although the flankers and kpps have tended to generationally shifted one height column to the right, the runners have stayed in that <180 to 184cm range.

Anyway, the Sydney team was named thus, (Although it did line up in slightly different postional order):

B: Crouch Barry R-Thomson
175,27,181 185,28,170 195,22,47
HB: Mathews C.Bolton Kennelly
182,27,158 190,25,102 190,24,100
C: Buchanan Goodes Dempster
180,23,47 194,25,160 192,21,21
HF: O'Keefe Hall J.Bolton
190,24,92 194,28,178 182,25,138
F: Williams O'Loughlin N.Davis
176,32,293 190,28,221 184,25,129
R: Jolly Kirk Ablett
200,24,71 184,29,122 184,23,53
I: Ball Bevan Fosdike Schneider
201,33,192 183,21,38 178,25,115 178,21,51
Again, experience in defence, especially on the flanks.
Competitive with two 200+cm ruckmen.
A good sprinkling of youngish runners around the midfield.