Agree,he can play & I'm sure the club knows that.tigers#7 said:Happy with that, good decision, theres a spot in the team for Rainsy imo. Has had a poor couple of years but I feel we havnt seen the best of him.
Agree,he can play & I'm sure the club knows that.tigers#7 said:Happy with that, good decision, theres a spot in the team for Rainsy imo. Has had a poor couple of years but I feel we havnt seen the best of him.
CptJonno2Madcow2005 said:Start building those Tram Tracks towards the Gold Coast![]()
His choice or he club's?CptJonno2Madcow2005 said:Start building those Tram Tracks towards the Gold Coast![]()
Clubs.[sort of].mb64 said:His choice or he club's?
We better keep Pettifer on the list thenCptJonno2Madcow2005 said:Clubs.[sort of].
Pretty sure clubs have to put up 2 players for the GC franchise.
Hasn't played this year much so the interest wouldn't be high.Stick with him.Tigers of Old said:Raines is in direct competition with Newman, Tambling, McMahon, Connors, Polo, White, Collins, King, Hyde, Meyer, Casserly, & Howat.
He probably sits closer to the front of that swarm of mid/small sized players than he does the rear but as you can see he is far from expendible.
His Dad is a Tiger legend but his son certainly isn't & he should definately be on the table at years end to see what interest there is.
mb64 said:Hasn't played this year much so the interest wouldn't be high.Stick with him.
Not yet,Pettifer is expendibleTigers of Old said:The interest wouldn't be high because he was poor last season.
Expendible.
mb64 said:Not yet,Pettifer is expendible
premiers08 said:I think even before he got injured he'd been found out a bit and all the opposition knew he was just gonna tuck it under his arm, have a couple of bounces then do a hospital pass to some poor soul further up the field.
As much as Hypoxic obviously disagrees I say trade him.
GoodOne said:He got injured because of a poor decision. Held onto the ball for far too long and then kicked a hospital ball as he was cleaned up. Not a fan of Raines unfortunately. Would there be much trade value though?
CptJonno2Madcow2005 said:Pretty sure clubs have to put up 2 players for the GC franchise.
Ian4 said:absolute crap. where did you hear that rubbish?
i've hard the new gold coast team will be given 20 out of the first 24 picks in the 2010 ND, but the catch is that they must trade a minimum of 10 of those picks to clubs for players. Expect something similar for west sydney in the 2011 ND.
mb64 said:Not yet,Pettifer is expendible
When the franchise was announced,however that was just one of the proposals at the time.Weather it,s written in stone im not sure.[hence the pretty sure remark]Ian4 said:absolute crap. where did you hear that rubbish?
They dont have to trade away any of their picks.But what it does do is give them the chance to get some decent mature players to the club instead of castoffs like the Brisbane Bears had to put up with.Ian4 said:i've hard the new gold coast team will be given 20 out of the first 24 picks in the 2010 ND, but the catch is that they must trade a minimum of 10 of those picks to clubs for players. Expect something similar for west sydney in the 2011 ND.