Rance and Selwood clash / an observation [Merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Rance and Selwood clash / an observation [Merged]

Been watching football for far too long and this is now in my top 3 "I think he might be dead" on-field incidents.

I think it was Richard Osbourne in Sydney when they drove the ambulance on to the ground - I'm convinced to this day he was dead.
Craig Nettlebeck against the Tigers at the G - If he didn't die he must have snapped his neck.
 
RFC not KFC said:
Been watching football for far too long and this is now in my top 3 "I think he might be dead" on-field incidents.

I think it was Richard Osbourne in Sydney when they drove the ambulance on to the ground - I'm convinced to this day he was dead.
Craig Nettlebeck against the Tigers at the G - If he didn't die he must have snapped his neck.

Thought Robert Wiley might've been killed when he ran into the goalpost v Essendon, early 80's.
 
Re: an observation

Dyer Disciple said:
I could give you tons of examples of great teams who have lost players fairly and not responded and not "done it for the boy". Fact is, if you are at the point of needing that as motivation you are in trouble in a game to begin with. Sometimes it works, sure, often it does not. Many times it hurts the side who lost the player, good and bad sides alike.

Never a truer word spoken on these forums.
I reckon emotion in footballers in general lasts all of about 5 minutes max in footy. Maybe less.
The whole black armbands thing etc is not undervalued in it's importance but it's totally overrated in it's ability to inspire players.
Once you've ridden it out as an opposition side it's quickly gone and back to nuts and bolts. In football you generally play your best when you're not thinking about other things.

Teams need to be focussed on winning the ball and winning the game first and foremost and forget about emotional circumstances surrounding it. The rest takes care of itself.
 
I thought the way we got flogged after the incident was very disappointing.

We didnt fire a shot for a 19yo who went to hospital for the jumper. I dont think this is a beat up at all. There is a serious question on the culture and attitudes of this playing group.
 
Re: an observation

Dyer Disciple said:
Nonsense. There is a big difference between a team responding to a player being felled deliberately and a team's response to a by product of a collision sport. No idea why you are bringing up the Jezza incident as entirely different.

Secondly, your backing away from your comments about where the players stood and how (which is the point of the discussion by the way) and now talking about how they should respond in general which is a different argument.

Your post is indulging in hysteria and massive over exaggeration..."complete bunch of no hopers who could not beat a local under 8's side"? Please. I'm tipping every player out on that field has done a lot more than you in football.

They may have done more than me in football (and if that is belonging to a very pathetic team, then I'm glad I never played football in any team like this lot the so called cream of the football world), but one thing I know is I'M A WINNER (everything I've ever done I've gone out to win), they are LOSERS.

Don't give any crap about attitude, Richmond excluding around 10 players DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT ATTITUDE. They suck, they whimper, they fold, they cannot handle pressure, they cannot make the right decisions on the field, they have no leadership, no teamwork, no pride, the coaching is pathetic, their disposal skills are pathetic, basically the entire football department of Richmond for all its promises are complete and utter losers.

If Richmond were a pack of dogs, they'd be beaten by a single Chihauhau because the Chihuahau has attitude, this lot have their tails right between their legs.

Overall, they're weak, every other club must be licking their lips at the thought of what percentage gain they'll get playing Richmond this year.

Rance went down doing the right thing by his team mates, who in turn did absolutely nothing for him in return.

Yeah you're right I don't know what was said in the huddles, but whatever was said didn't work did it, they continued to play like the losers they have become. If that's hysteria so be it, but its also REALITY, Richmond are a complete and utter laughing stock.
 
Re: an observation

Massai said:
They may have done more than me in football (and if that is belonging to a very pathetic team, then I'm glad I never played football in any team like this lot the so called cream of the football world), but one thing I know is I'M A WINNER (everything I've ever done I've gone out to win), they are LOSERS.

Don't give any crap about attitude, Richmond excluding around 10 players DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT ATTITUDE. They suck, they whimper, they fold, they cannot handle pressure, they cannot make the right decisions on the field, they have no leadership, no teamwork, no pride, the coaching is pathetic, their disposal skills are pathetic, basically the entire football department of Richmond for all its promises are complete and utter losers.

If Richmond were a pack of dogs, they'd be beaten by a single Chihauhau because the Chihuahau has attitude, this lot have their tails right between their legs.

Overall, they're weak, every other club must be licking their lips at the thought of what percentage gain they'll get playing Richmond this year.

Rance went down doing the right thing by his team mates, who in turn did absolutely nothing for him in return.

Yeah you're right I don't know what was said in the huddles, but whatever was said didn't work did it, they continued to play like the losers they have become. If that's hysteria so be it, but its also REALITY, Richmond are a complete and utter laughing stock.

You won't get any argument from me that we are a laughing stock, but there is a fine line between being tough and being disrespectful.

You're having a rant about a lot of obvious things, we are mentally weak? Sure. Not taken seriously by other teams? Of course. Playing badly? We've won only one game.

We know all these things Massai but to start reading into incidents like Rance's accident and picking at every little morsel the media throw to you (like the Newman comment) is just jumping on the media bandwagon of negative hysteria that the Herald Sun and co have made money off for years.

I agree with a fair bit of what you post, I have said for years we must run tougher camps and sessions in pre-season. We definitely need to work on our mental toughness and discipline.

The players should not be getting a pass, but I know there are players out there who are playing to the 100% of their ability and bleed for our club. They may or may not be good enough to play at AFL level, but who's fault is that they are playing?

The problems go a lot deeper and need a lot more than boot camps mate and they go a lot further than the playing list and coaches and game plan.

In tough times in a organisation (not war), true leadership is marshalling with your "troops". Installing true discipline and structure and implementing change, that takes time.

I put it to you that you could take the best "Coach" your imagination could fathom and give them our current playing list and they might win 2 more games in a season, would they get respect and show discipline on the field? No. They would just be better conditioned.

What would happen is you would have a supposesdly hard side that ran out onto the ground and soon loose that hardness as they watched teammates kick the ball to the opposition constantly, make wrong decisions, hold onto the ball or run too long, lead to the wrong spots, play unaccountable football etc.

You're spot on about us being mentally weak and needing to improve, our discipline is non existant etc. However we simply do not have the talent, either through proper development or sheer capacity for it, in many of our players that other lists have.

A team of Tim Flemmings (some people on here will love that thought :hihi) won't win you many games of footy.

I think I understand where you are coming from and your values so I see why it is so important to you, but you can't get narrow visioned and go over the top. You have to work with the list and not against it while we get ourselves out of this mire.

Put the emphasis on the players simply through hard work and processes, not ridicule and abuse. The players are responsible in some ways for more than they are held accountable for, however they also cop a lot of crap for things way out of their control. We need hardness, but it must be done cold and calculating.

The best leaders know when to be hard and supportive, not just 100% hard. There are some gems in our list and there is a lot of fools gold. We need a better filtering system than boot camps to sort that out and better structures in place outside of the playing and coaching staff to ensure we never get into this mess again and start addressing the deeper list problems immediately.
 
Re: an observation

Dyer Disciple said:
A team of Tim Flemmings (some people on here will love that thought :hihi) won't win you many games of footy.

Agree.

I think Massai makes some very good points but the bottom line is we need better footballers than we have.

There are too many 'Flemmings' still on the list who actually try pretty hard but are simply poor disposers of the ball and make poor decisions. 'Glass half full types' as was described succinctly by Redders.
All the ra ra in the world won't fix the fundamentals.

King, McGuane, Jackson, Pattison, Tuck & even Rance are no shrinking violets but their disposal is pretty rank.

We won't improve until we have better skilled players. Only once we have found them, can we then work on their mental aptitude.
 
As I've said for the last couple of years on this site, the changes have to happen around the football department and slowly filter into it, instead of the constant easy supporter focus on the playing list/coaching team and then slowly look outside it.

Only when we have the right football department leadership, structure and recruiting and development teams in place will we start to turn it around.

That also takes money..but now I'm opening Pandora's box. :hihi
 
Re: an observation

Dyer Disciple said:
I could give you tons of examples of great teams who have lost players fairly and not responded and not "done it for the boy". Fact is, if you are at the point of needing that as motivation you are in trouble in a game to begin with. Sometimes it works, sure, often it does not. Many times it hurts the side who lost the player, good and bad sides alike.


I broke some ribs a few years ago backing into a pack in a marking contest. It was during a close game and at 3 quarter time the coach made a big deal about the incident, saying the team should “win it for Kurtzy” yadda yadda.

We lost.
 
Re: an observation

Col.W.Kurtz said:
I broke some ribs a few years ago backing into a pack in a marking contest. It was during a close game and at 3 quarter time the coach made a big deal about the incident, saying the team should “win it for Kurtzy” yadda yadda.

We lost.

Not too popular with your team mates hey Kurtzy? ;) :hihi
 
Re: an observation

Tigers of Old said:
Not too popular with your team mates hey Kurtzy? ;) :hihi

Actually Kurtzy dominates, his teammates were probably buggered from the 56 times he tapped it down to them by 3/4 time and couldn't go on with it as he over fed them the ball earlier.

(I expect a cheque in the mail Kurtzy ;) )
 
Re: an observation

Tigers of Old said:
Not too popular with your team mates hey Kurtzy? ;) :hihi

Apparently they felt the best and most appropriate way to honour my sacrifice was to lose the football game. I’m sure the coach would have bought me a beer at the after match function had I not been in hospital.

Dyer Disciple said:
(I expect a cheque in the mail Kurtzy ;) )

done and done
 
Dyer Disciple said:
As I've said for the last couple of years on this site, the changes have to happen around the football department and slowly filter into it, instead of the constant easy supporter focus on the playing list/coaching team and then slowly look outside it.

Only when we have the right football department leadership, structure and recruiting and development teams in place will we start to turn it around.

That also takes money..but now I'm opening Pandora's box. :hihi

Not really DD, if we just want to use our picks on guys who can kick and make wise choices with the ball we will turn it around much quicker. Take 5 or 6 picks this year,pinch a 17 year old prospect at the back end of the draft for the next three years, take another ruckman in the rookie draft, pick smalls and mediums who can kick in the rookie draft and you will get results. Small baby steps.
 
SCOOP said:
Not really DD, if we just want to use our picks on guys who can kick and make wise choices with the ball we will turn it around much quicker. Take 5 or 6 picks this year,pinch a 17 year old prospect at the back end of the draft for the next three years, take another ruckman in the rookie draft, pick smalls and mediums who can kick in the rookie draft and you will get results. Small baby steps.

Sure, but my point is, without properly structured and funded recruitment and development departments and without the right personnel running them, you'd end up not maximising or wasting picks more than having successes as we have excelled at and proven.

It's not just enough to get a player who can contribute 50 games when 4 sides pick 4 players before us who we never considered that will go on to play 150 and actually contribute stongly.

Yes we need to pick players who can kick, which we have not, but you need to do a lot more than that too than just have the picks.

If you don't have a strong team supporting the football department you have a foundation built on quicksand at best, and most likely a false economy doomed to fail. That's why you have to concentrate from outside in, rather than inside to out when talking about footy departments.
 
Re: an observation

Massai said:
The team should have been in a huddle a few metres away Ian, they don't have to be right up next to the player concerned, but a few metres away should'nt get in the way of anyone. Of course the team Captain could have and should have gotten everyone together in a huddle, midfield if necessary and spoken to all the players and gotten their minds focusing on what needed to be done to win.

Didn't happen, I'm not surprised in the least.

I agree - I was most disappointed that no-one was anywhere near Rance while the medicos were with him. Yes it's an unexpected opportunity for the players to consult and the captain to address them but surely his situation was the most important concern?

I actually would have loved to see Newy direct Foley to talk to the group nearby to Rance, and Newy himself close in to the medical group (it goes without saying no-one should get in the way of the medicos!), and escorting him off the ground.

That to me would send the best message to everyone - to Rance himself (even if he's not aware til later); to his parents (who were at the game); to the other players (there but for the grace of God...); to us the supporters; and even to other clubs/supporters - that his team was there for him and the game was secondary. As it was - why should he go in so hard next time?

Oh yes, I know - I'm being a girl.
 
This is the type of thing that should inspire the senior blokes. He knew contact was going to come and he still went in head first.

The thing i dont like about us is that it seems when we have a player bumped or someone getting belted up not many go in to help. You need your mates to band together.

We should always pick up team mates of the bottom of packs and tap them on the back after every contest win lose or draw.