-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Re-signings
- Thread starter 1965
- Start date
let me say i think craig is absolutely right in questioning those in charge.there are strong cases for and against wallace and millers roles at the club so far.a simple fact is most ferals only focus on the positives and totally ignore the negatives.just because someone is in the system at the highest level does not mean they dont make mistakes or arent wrong.
i for one am very confidant in judging footy talent and without pulling my own chain have not been wrong to often about players over the yrs.
when craig says hall and in particular peetifer are chumps i have to agree in fact i would describe them in all fairness as average at best.they are not going to take us to sustained success and as such should be traded while they still have some worth.
i for one am very confidant in judging footy talent and without pulling my own chain have not been wrong to often about players over the yrs.
when craig says hall and in particular peetifer are chumps i have to agree in fact i would describe them in all fairness as average at best.they are not going to take us to sustained success and as such should be traded while they still have some worth.
Most of the re-signings are for 1 year only. Miller has cast an eye over the draftees and obviously does not believe that there is much worth taking after 3 rounds. I don't know because I haven't watched the draftees that closely. But it makes sense IMO to keep what we have for another year and then try and pick up as much young talent as we can in next years superdraft.
Tigers of Old said:
This is indeed great news. Hope the club can now concentrate on accomodating young David!