I don't know why this is so difficult. Someone decided in 1988 that these players won the club best & fairest award. There is no record of these winners prior to 1988, therefore we need to see the basis for the 1988 additions.Why? I think any evidence should definitively prove that the awards weren't given out, not that can't proof that that they were - the onus is on the prosecution.
I don't know how the 16 new winners of a non-existent award could have found their way into the annual report without the club's approval. Would be useful if Rhett could elaborate.Huh? Rhett is suggesting that the club gave out more awards without the approval of the club?