RFC on Wikipedia - WTF?

[davidrodan]

Gold !

yeah still makes me laugh

 

[davidrodan]

2k, and then some. But at least he saw tears in Greg's eyes when they realised that Rance and Selwood would both be available at our pick 18.

I think the tears were in Frank's eyes not Greg's

 

[Redford]

2k, and then some. But at least he saw tears in Greg's eyes when they realised that Rance and Selwood would both be available at our pick 18.

I think you're confusing it with a different auction. You're referring to the National Draft. I'm referring to yesterday.

 

[Knighter]

Spot on Breadboard.

 

[Shers]

Fair enough Red. I started to question myself after I typed it.

 

[Redford]

Fair enough Red. I started to question myself after I typed it.

No soup for you Sherswood Casino !

 

[smasha]

classic LOLOLOLMAOOOOOO. :rofl

 

[Col.E.Kurtz]

Just another poor soul who couldn’t find $1600 to sit in the RFC recruiters box.

If only you had more that just the avatar and the signature to use as auto generated messages to continue your feuds with fellow PREers

 

[Redford]

If only you had more that just the avatar and the signature to use as auto generated messages to continue your feuds with fellow PREers

If only you'd post something that wasnt either soft, or just another apologetic excuse for Richmond. That would certainly be something different.

 

[Col.E.Kurtz]

If only you'd post something that wasnt either soft, or just another apologetic excuse for Richmond. That would certainly be something different.

You left out my use of meaningless statistics to defend players that most of PRE has already decided is a useless dud.

 

[Redford]

You left out my use of meaningless statistics to defend players that most of PRE has already decided is a useless dud.

No, your use of statistics is actually quite meaningful because it usually shows WHY a player is copping criticism from so many and not actually a defense. The Tambling stuff is classical in that regard.

 

[Col.E.Kurtz]

No, your use of statistics is actually quite meaningful because it usually shows WHY a player is copping criticism from so many and not actually a defense. The Tambling stuff is classical in that regard.

It’s not really me that the master of the Bling statistics, that’s Disco. I’m actually fairly disappointed with Bling this year and could prove it statistically or anecdotally.

I just get annoyed when people dismiss statistics because they don’t suit their argument. 

 

[Redford]

It’s not really me that the master of the Bling statistics, that’s Disco. I’m actually fairly disappointed with Bling this year and could prove it statistically or anecdotally.

I just get annoyed when dismiss statistics because they don’t suit their argument.

I love 'em for exactly the opposite reason.