GoodOne said:Just shows that possession stats are meaningless. How may times this year has the Tigers had ore possessions and marks than the opposition and lost the match convincingly. Here are the meaningful stats. Contesed possession 91 to 88 our way, contested marks 12 to 7 our way, clangers 35 to 42 Melbourne, clearances 35 to 29 our way, inside 50s 56 to 46 our way, 1%ers 38 to 36 our way. So other than tackles where we know we're inherenetly bad and need to improve we were in front in all the more meaningful stats. All Melbourne's number of possessions show based on this other information is that they kicked the ball around alot with meaningless and ineffective possession, something that the Tigers and many poor peerforming teams seem to get in the habit of doing.
Spot on