TigerForce said:Bert & Ernie revisited.
Tiger74 said:But are Red and JB a closet job like Bert and Ernie are?
Redford said:Either you cant read, or you reckon Thomas, Clarke, Pendlebury, Goldsack, Clarke HAVENT been good selections.
jb03 said:You think mentioning Clarke twice makes him a better player or somehow boosts your argument?
Thomas: Highlights package at best, the type of player you usually detest
Clarke (both times): Tadhg Kennelly wanna be that can barely get a game
Pendlebury: Dyer 'ere advised me he is soft as butter and is a leper, good enough for me
Goldwho?: As he plays for Collingwood he gets wraps beyond his actual output
I suppose you don't want to talk about Reid, Dawes, Egan, *smile*, Stanley, Cook, Iacobucci or any of their other failures in recent years.
Redford said:Throw in Nathan Brown as another success as well.
Pendlebury is a "leper" is he ? Hmmm. The 2007 runner up in the NAB Rising Star Award must be a 25 disposal "leper" then judging by tonights efforts. Wonder why the commentators said North had to do something about him tonight....?
I note you have now had to go on the defensive by referring to failures, which was not your original question.
Tough to beat some of your past efforts I know, but this could yet be your most embarrassing thread ever. To quote Big Kev: I'm excited !
jb03 said:Not sure self congratulating wins you an argument. Brown has played 4 games and will be demoted before year ends. On Pendlebury, well Raines also finished runner up in the Rising Star and regularly gets 25 possessions yet you are highly critical of him, and if you like calling dyer 'ere a liar then that is fine. Listing 4 players, (or do you want to list them twice to make it 8 ) of arguable quality against a majority of failures is an odd way to get excited.
No wonder Sneezy no longer posts here, must have gone to the Spongebob Squarepants Forums to get some intelligent debate.
He is a terrible kick.jb03 said:Can't see what the excitement about Ben Reid is. Looked awful tonight.