Round 6 team Vs Port [MERGED] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Round 6 team Vs Port [MERGED]

Re: From footyratings.com

rosy23 said:
The Richmond Missing
David Rodan
(60 games, 43 goals)
Brent Hartigan
(21 games, 2 goals)
Chris Hyde
(35 games, 6 goals)
Jay Schulz
(21 games, 14 goals)

The Port Adelaide Missing
Chad Cornes
(125 games, 110 goals)
Shaun Burgoyne
(68 games, 81 goals)
Aaron Shattock
(61 games, 16 goals)
Roger James
(140 games, 86 goals)
Suspended
Dean Brogan
(58 games, 22 goals)

Richmond at Telstra Dome
(Won 2 of the last 8
Lost Rd5 2005 v St Kilda
Won Rd3 2005 v Western Bulldogs
Lost Rd16 2004 v St Kilda
Lost Rd13 2004 v Carlton
Lost Rd11 2004 v Kangaroos
Won Rd6 2004 v Hawthorn
Lost Rd5 2004 v Adelaide
Lost Rd 4 2004 v Geelong

Port Adelaide at Telstra Dome
(Won 6 of the last 8
Lost Rd18 2004 v Essendon
Lost Rd8 2004 v Kangaroos
Won Rd21 v Richmond
Won Rd15 203 v Western Bulldogs
Won Rd9 2003 v Essendon
Won Rd11 2002 v Essendon
Won 3 2002 v St Kilda
Won 21 2001 v Western Bulldogs (n)

Footyratings Tip
Richmond

Overall Record
Richmond: 2 Port Adelaide: 8

Record at MCG
Richmond: 1 Port Adelaide: 1

Milestones
200th Game
Matthew Richardson (Richmond)
1993-2005: 199 games, 596 goals

150th Game
Adam Kingsley (Port Adelaide)
1997-2005: 149 games, 35 goals

The Last Six
(Richmond 0, Port Adelaide 6)
Rd 9 2004 Port Adelaide 19. 14 (128) def Richmond 7. 8 (50) Subiaco Oval
Rd 21, 2003 Port Adelaide 18. 16 (124) def Richmond 16. 8 (104) Telstra Dome
Rd 6, 2003 Port Adelaide 12. 12 (84) def Richmond 8. 9 (57) AAMI Stadium
Rd 12, 2002 Port Adelaide 23. 26 (154) def Richmond 10. 10 (70) Football Park
Rd 15, 2001 Port Adelaide 14. 12 (96) def Richmond 7. 10 (52) Football Park
Rd 15, 2000 Port Adelaide 15. 13 (103) def Richmond 11. 9 (75) Football Park


Richmond: Have won 3 from 5 for the season. Coming off a 68 point loss to St Kilda at Telstra Dome in Round 5, following a 48 point win over Fremantle at the MCG, and a 4 point win over the Western Bulldogs at the Telstra Dome in Round 3. Currently in 7th place on the ladder at 87.97%.

Port Adelaide: Have won 1 from 5 for the season. Coming off a 4 point loss to Geelong at AAMI Stadium in Round 5, following a draw with Carlton at AAMI Stadium in Round 4, and a 68 point loss to Adelaide at AAMI Stadium in Round 3. Currently in 13th place on the ladder at 78.70%.
Click to expand...

what the?????? :hihi
 
Williams denies hangover
April 29, 2005

FOR a teetotaller like Port Adelaide coach Mark Williams, the concept of any hangover - let alone a premiership-sized one - is hard to grasp.

Williams accepts Port's AFL premiership defence hasn't gone to plan, with the club languishing in 13th position with just one win this season.

Some pundits have labelled the slide a premiership hangover, noting Port needs to rejuvenate its side to repeat last year's inaugural flag.

"Rejuvenation ... is just rubbish to us," Williams said today.

Port enters Sunday's away clash with Richmond having let slip two home games in past weeks - a draw against Carlton, and a four-point loss to Geelong.

"We are not far from it, we think we are getting better," Williams said.

"One kick, two weeks in a row, would have won us the game and we'd be third on the ladder, so we're looking at it from a positive point of view.

"But we will need that one kick this week if we are to get the result."

The desired result is victory over the seventh-placed Tigers, and Williams doesn't care how it is achieved.

"I want to see a win - there's no doubt that whatever it takes, we're going to win," he said.

"It makes it difficult to finish high up the ladder if we don't win this week, but it's not impossible."

http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,15123497-23211,00.html
 
Official Ins and Outs

In Meyer, Tambling, Johnson
Out Hyde, Raines. Jackson >:( >:( >:( >:(

From SMS update.
 
Jacko doesn't deserve to be dropped.
I won't be surprised if Johno doesn't line-up.
Pettifer Graham Chaffey and Krak should consider themselves extremely lucky.
 
Honestly, how do Raines and Jackson get dropped ahead of Krakouer and Pettifer ?
Click to expand...

Probably to do with team balance/match ups

But I tend to agree - Jacko in a forward pocket would give us more than Krak in his present form.
 
no point dropping these players until the young uns are ready to replace them on a permanent basis

get used to these guys being in the side for pretty much the whole year...

the only young players who may be able to be full time players as this stage are schulz hartigan
and moore and as we know all these players have had injury problems..
 
Redford said:
Honestly, how do Raines and Jackson get dropped ahead of Krakouer and Pettifer ?
Click to expand...

Particularly Krak.What did he have last week, 4 touches?I get more than that at the Cougar Bar. ;D
 
While Jackson might be young he hasn't done much at all will not hurt him to go back to the 2's and get a kick
 
I feel bad for Jackson as he has been servicable although I do agree will do him good to goto Cobrg and be a full game midfielder and get some confidence. Krakouer hasnt been great this season but he has been getting the footy except for last week when he did nothing although I dont agree with dropping blokes after 1 bad game. I think he takes to olong to make a decision though with the ball and that needs to be worked on.

Balm Army I am with you on Graham, he deserves is spot in the team and I have rated his sweason so far as quite good for hte roles he has been playing.
 
crackertiger said:
Has Wallace got something against last years recruits.

Jackson
Roach
Raines
Gilmour

Out of the side.
Click to expand...
Agree Crackertiger,Astounding changes.Jackson has every right to be peeved & so does Raines.Gilmour deserved his chance.Is Mark Graham on a weekly promise?
 
Ok i can sort of understand why Jacko got dropped purely on the basis that this is really his 1st year and short spells on and off the bench is probally not the ideal way to learn the trade.I agree that both Krak and petticoat are very lucky as much as Jacko being unlucky along with Raines.
I would have preferred to keep Jonno out for another week to be on the safe side and keep either Raines or Jacko in.
 
how the hell does pettifer keep getting a game every week? i am disgusted that TW overlooks his poor performances week after week and drops the kids only because he has a few more games under his belt. what are blokes like him, chaff, krakouer offerring us. NOTHING. nothing but pain and sufferring and frustration for 2 and a half hours every week. I'm pissed off these imposters have got everyone from the selectors all the way to some ignorant supporters fooled.

i am sick and tired of the poor lame excuses week after week that so and so is too young or not developed enough or needs game time at coburg. its all *smile*. these guys are wasting space on the list and denying OUR kids the oppurtunity to develop at AFL level.

uuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrghhhhhhhhhhhh!
 
Deep breathes Lebo, c'mon mate settle and don't loose it completely. I agree with you about pettifer but the kids time will come soon enough. They have waited all their lives to play consistently in the seniors at the RFC - their time will come sooner rather than later mate.
 
I'd prefer that they give Johnno another week and kept Jacko in. Delighted to see that Meyer and Bling are getting a game, though. Would Jacko get back in if Johnno doesn't come up?
 
What do you do if Johnno doesnt play - do you go for the bigger bodied player in Jackson against a strong PA side or do you go for the speed of a Raines or Roach on a fast TD surface???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
< West Coast Mk.2 | Campbell relishes new role (The Age) >
Top Bottom