round 7 - other games | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

round 7 - other games

checkside said:
Mitch Clark kicked 3 goals for Brisbane in his first game of the year :-[

has more talent in his finger than jon has everywhere else

but we didnt want him
 
MC said:
Exactly, Harvey did bring this upon himself.

How many coaching jobs were not good enough for him, I have forgotton but it would be the Geelong, Hawthorn, richmond, Kangaroos and possibly more

He didn't want the Footscray job because he thought their finances and facilities weren't up to it. :hihi

Harvey is dimwitted, don't know how they gave him the job.... Oh wait.
 
I was listening to the game and heard Shockers 50 points up and thought 'game over'.

And then a 10 goal turnaround...........
 
Zoso said:
He didn't want the Footscray job because he thought their finances and facilities weren't up to it. :hihi

Harvey is dimwitted, don't know how they gave him the job.... Oh wait.

:cutelaugh :cutelaugh

Even if he had Manchester United's facilities, he still couldn't make Tarrant, Mark Johnson and Keplar Bradley any good!
 
;D You guys think that we have problems.Who would admit to being a freo supporter?
 
Well, well done to the Dees, I thought, what a game ot have on telly, but they turned it around, albeit to Freo, but what a win !

And, with Port, you can never write them off.

I think I got maybe 1 tip this week, from 8 last week (the draw counted!!)
 
SaveFerris said:
Oh dear, all of Hawthorns 23 points came from the boundry line, good one.


Not only did Hawthorn miss goals from near the pockets they were missing them from upfront, the demolition of inside 50's is clear indication of where the majority of the play was.

Hawthorn kicked 20 behinds last week the rest were rushed. Of those 20 only 2 were kicked from the FF area, 4 were kicked from the CHF area, the rest were all kicked from the flanks. There wasn't one behind kicked from the pockets. goal map on the AFL website is pretty clear go and have a look.

Given you are totally ignorant about the way your team plays, you probably aren't aware that Hawthorn is the leader in behinds kicked versus the opposition. You better get used to teams kicking straighter than your team.

The way Hawthorn zone means that they push the ball wide and which is where they have to bring it back from. Its hard to get inside 50 against Hawthon, but once the opposition breaks the zone, the 50m arc is pretty clear and goal conversion ratios are very good.
 
2nd greatest half time comeback of all time, well done Dee's, suck pondscum Freo, ha ha ha Merry Christmas!
 
Bill James said:
Hawthorn kicked 20 behinds last week the rest were rushed. Of those 20 only 2 were kicked from the FF area, 4 were kicked from the CHF area, the rest were all kicked from the flanks. There wasn't one behind kicked from the pockets. goal map on the AFL website is pretty clear go and have a look.

Pockets flanks, who gives a sh*t, Hawthorn kicked like poo and atleast 5 goals more should have been kicked by the Hawthorn FC, that score line flattered the Richmond FC.

Bill James said:
Given you are totally ignorant about the way your team plays, you probably aren't aware that Hawthorn is the leader in behinds kicked versus the opposition. You better get used to teams kicking straighter than your team.
The way Hawthorn zone means that they push the ball wide and which is where they have to bring it back from. Its hard to get inside 50 against Hawthon, but once the opposition breaks the zone, the 50m arc is pretty clear and goal conversion ratios are very good.

Oh dear, apart from the Richmond game the highest amount of behinds scored over the opposistion was 4, thats also not taking into account the total number of goals Hawthorn had out scored its opposition.
 
tigers#7 said:
Bombers suck.

they are crap but to be fair also have their injuries

Lucas, Mcveigh, Davey, Fletcher etc is a handy group and when you have no depth you cant cover that
 
carrs headland bell mcmanus peake schammer farmer black solomon webster johnson all mids onballers all duds. its their mids and onballers who ar the problem i reckon potentially they are very good in the big man dept their tall structure is okay.

murphy and cambell impress me they need to be persevered with throw in pavlich and their forward line looks good. mundy drum johnson mcpharlin grover and thornton are all tall backs throw in sandilands and warnock as ruckmen and they have the makings of a very good big man dept i think the oldest tall on their list is pavlich at 27. no sorry that would be the 28yo dud tarrant.its everywhere else they are struggling though.

any way bloody brilliant to see them lose again rabble is being kind when summing up this club.
 
the claw said:
carrs headland bell mcmanus peake schammer farmer black solomon webster johnson all mids onballers all duds. its their mids and onballers who ar the problem i reckon potentially they are very good in the big man dept their tall structure is okay.

Under the Rules of Freo, this means they will probably start trading big men as they will be blaming them for not leading well enough to receive the ball :hihi
 
Just watching On the Couch with Mark Harvey........what a goose..........this dud speaks like a 10 year old kid.

He's virtually being 'coached' by Walls on what he should do to fix up Freo.