so it`s ok to tell someone you`ve committed a child sex offence on their 6 year old daughter is it?Tigermad2005 said:He is spot on.
mopsy fraser said:so it`s ok to tell someone you`ve committed a child sex offence on their 6 year old daughter is it?
mopsy fraser said:so it`s ok to tell someone you`ve committed a child sex offence on their 6 year old daughter is it?
mopsy fraser said:i think sam is awesome
Disco08 said:Of course he's soft. He's as soft as they come. The strong would have taken the insult (highly doubtful that it went like Headland said anyway IMO) and used it as motivation for the rest of the game, not used it as a reason to blow their top and give their team a substandard performance for the rest of the game and risk being suspended for weeks (which should have happened). Revenge for what was allegedly said would have been far better served when Selwood had the ball and a big hit on him would have given his whole team momentum.
jb03 said:He has actually created a fantastic precedent for himself. If reported, all he has to say in the future is someone had a go at his daughter/tattoo/family.
Tigers of Old said:Problem is jack black he's set a whole precedent for every player in the AFL to use that argument.![]()
hellenictiger said:I'll say it one last time, Des Headland isnt soft. He isnt a cry baby, soft people like to do make complaints and take action after the game the "smart" way.
Because they dont have balls to risk anything, if it be being hit or missing matches. He didnt take it and the soft bloke was the one with his head rammed into the ground.
mopsy fraser said:i think sam is awesome and usually agree with what he says, but he has just come out on the footy show and said it is ok to say to an opposition player that their 6 year old daughter is a s#** and that they had sex with her. he reckons it is ok because it`s only a joke.
Disco08 said:Of course he's soft. He's as soft as they come. The strong would have taken the insult (highly doubtful that it went like Headland said anyway IMO) and used it as motivation for the rest of the game, not used it as a reason to blow their top and give their team a substandard performance for the rest of the game and risk being suspended for weeks (which should have happened). Revenge for what was allegedly said would have been far better served when Selwood had the ball and a big hit on him would have given his whole team momentum.