Hutchy's latest book " the righteous path of the self obsessed" should go on the rack where the sold hot cakes were. His other book "Bedroom mirror ideas for narcissists" only sold small numbers. I mean, is he up himself or what?
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
SEN 116 on air argument
- Thread starter poppa x
- Start date
par⋅a⋅site
pærəˌsaɪt [par-uh-sahyt]
–noun
1. an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment.
2. a person who receives support, advantage, or the like, from another or others without giving any useful or proper return, as one who lives on the hospitality of others.
3. (in ancient Greece) a person who received free meals in return for amusing or impudent conversation, flattering remarks, etc.
2 is just about the perfect description of hutchy i reckon
pærəˌsaɪt [par-uh-sahyt]
–noun
1. an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment.
2. a person who receives support, advantage, or the like, from another or others without giving any useful or proper return, as one who lives on the hospitality of others.
3. (in ancient Greece) a person who received free meals in return for amusing or impudent conversation, flattering remarks, etc.
2 is just about the perfect description of hutchy i reckon
Redford said:That’s an old photo. (He has much less hair and is more cherubic now.)
But thanks for the positive post. Pity a few others couldn’t be more positive. :
I'm with you Redford in fact I am going to end my allegiance to the RFC and get fully behind Team Hutchy :happy
This thread is not about Hutchy.
It's about Tony Sheehan claiming he had FOUR (4 FFS) sources that told him Wallace had been sacked.
He also said Robbo's sources (plural) were different to his.
So that makes more than 5 moles - if you believe Sheehan.
Now I ask you "do you really believe there are more than 5 disloyal people at Richmond?
I think not.
It's about Tony Sheehan claiming he had FOUR (4 FFS) sources that told him Wallace had been sacked.
He also said Robbo's sources (plural) were different to his.
So that makes more than 5 moles - if you believe Sheehan.
Now I ask you "do you really believe there are more than 5 disloyal people at Richmond?
I think not.
