Tigers of Old said:
I love the fact that when Schulz has a set shot I am confident it will go through 90% of the time. So nice for a change.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
So Transparent may as well be naked!
- Thread starter Harro12
- Start date
I love the fact that when Schulz has a set shot I am confident it will go through 90% of the time. So nice for a change.
Yep least Rawlings seems to be having zero impact on Jay's kicking.
Then again perhaps he is in other ways.. 8)
Then again perhaps he is in other ways.. 8)
ullhair. Its on the full :-[ :-[ now just do the opposite to what I did fellas. 
mb64 said:
Rawlings 52.2% which is abysmal, Richo 59.5%. But I would imagine being a 'forward coach' would entail a lot more than working on kicking techniques.
Imagine if we'd said to Tom Hafey, "What would you know about winning premierships, you never played in one".
mb64 said:
No. Where did you pull that from?
38 goals 15 behinds = 71.69%
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/pc-richmond-tigers--jay-schulz
When I read this I thought to myself imagine if this document was "leaked" or found by someone and published. There'd be an outcry that Richmonds "top secrets" were out there but because it's openly published no-one really cares as it provides virtually no insight.
Also reminded me of Warne and Waugh who said they provided basic info like this to "John" the bookie, basic info that is virtually useless.
My point is it's perception. If we think we aren't meant to see something and we do see it it's great but if we see it when we are meant to see it's irrelevent.
Also reminded me of Warne and Waugh who said they provided basic info like this to "John" the bookie, basic info that is virtually useless.
My point is it's perception. If we think we aren't meant to see something and we do see it it's great but if we see it when we are meant to see it's irrelevent.