-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
So who goes?
- Thread starter Tigerdog
- Start date
Chaffey - Delisted
Humm - Delisted
Moore - Delisted
Roach - Delisted
Stafford - Retired
Rodan - Delisted (should have been delisted when asked for 2 years, would still delist despite having a year to run on contract, waste of a space on the list. Get a kid on, we are not paying the full salary cap anyway.)
The above are 5 who should definitely go, 6 if RFC has the balls to get rid of Rodan.
Krakouer - Trade, doubt would get much interest though.
I look at it with a view that, will any of the players being let go in the future be looked at as a mistake. With the above players I have no doubts.
Their is obviously alot of players who will be line ball that I haven't mentioned, we all know who they are. Though from a team structure & depending who else gets the bullet some will stay, some will go.
Humm - Delisted
Moore - Delisted
Roach - Delisted
Stafford - Retired
Rodan - Delisted (should have been delisted when asked for 2 years, would still delist despite having a year to run on contract, waste of a space on the list. Get a kid on, we are not paying the full salary cap anyway.)
The above are 5 who should definitely go, 6 if RFC has the balls to get rid of Rodan.
Krakouer - Trade, doubt would get much interest though.
I look at it with a view that, will any of the players being let go in the future be looked at as a mistake. With the above players I have no doubts.
Their is obviously alot of players who will be line ball that I haven't mentioned, we all know who they are. Though from a team structure & depending who else gets the bullet some will stay, some will go.
the claw said:
Is that really you CLAW. Yes I agree with Jacko. He was a later starter and probably a bit of a late developer because of that, but as you say has shown a bit which may want perservering with.
I actually heard that Wallace has a high opinion of him.
Yet again you continue to confound.the claw said:
You pump up Jackson's tyres(who's shown very little), yet have grave doubts about a player like Schulz, a KPP who shows oodles more ability than Jackson. :spin
IMPO I would keep Jackson for another year but I would not be surprised one iota if he's delisted. His disposal is appalling.
richards42 said:
Agree with everything you just said. Hartigan was in great form at the start of this year and just before he got injured he looked like coming back to the seniors. We need a tough, ballsy player who team members can hold thier head up high around. I think Hartigan could be that player.
Delist/retire - Stafford, Chaffey, Moore, Humm, Knobel, Rodan (although contract will probably prevent this). I also agree that Jackson may be a concern.
Potential trades (although for little benefit) - Krakouer, Tivendale, Hall, Gaspar (yes, I'd straight swap Mal Michael for him in a heartbeat) and then anyone else who we might get some value for.
Just my 5c worth.
Potential trades (although for little benefit) - Krakouer, Tivendale, Hall, Gaspar (yes, I'd straight swap Mal Michael for him in a heartbeat) and then anyone else who we might get some value for.
Just my 5c worth.
dont worry old tiger i have concerns about jackson as well. but at this point in time i would think it prudent to perservere with both for one more yr at least. at 21 next yr jacko needs to make the next step or be delisted.Tigers of Old said:
ive only made comment on schulz because so many seem to think hes going to be the next big thing and i just cant see it. he has deficiencies and most seem to ignore them.
IMPO I would keep Jackson for another year but I would not be surprised one iota if he's delisted. His disposal is appalling.
dont worry old tiger i have concerns about jackson as well. but at this point in time i would think it prudent to perservere with both for one more yr at least. at 21 next yr jacko needs to make the next step or be delisted.
ive only made comment on schulz because so many seem to think hes going to be the next big thing and i just cant see it. he has deficiencies and most seem to ignore them.
What would they be?
dont worry old tiger i have concerns about jackson as well. but at this point in time i would think it prudent to perservere with both for one more yr at least. at 21 next yr jacko needs to make the next step or be delisted.
ive only made comment on schulz because so many seem to think hes going to be the next big thing and i just cant see it. he has deficiencies and most seem to ignore them.
What would they be?
