Some Stats From The Port Game ...

[tannerztigers]

We had 95 more marks! 95! is that a record? 157 - 62
We had 86 more disposals than them. 392 - 306
In saying that, they had 1 more handball.
They smashed us in hitouts. 42-20.
We had 1 more tackle! 48-47. That is different.

 

[seven]

How did we go in the kicking department.

More kicks then handballs?

 

[bowden4president]

We had 95 more marks! 95! is that a record? 157 - 62
We had 86 more disposals than them. 392 - 306
In saying that, they had 1 more handball.
They smashed us in hitouts. 42-20.
We had 1 more tackle! 48-47. That is different.

Simmo is really struggling. His knee looks like it is really troubling him and you could actually see him limping out there today!

Port can blame themselves for that mark count, Man up and you won't get marks like that!!

 

[tannerztigers]

We had 87 more kicks than handballs

 

[J_Rod]

We had 87 more kicks than handballs

That hasnt happend for a while. Sorry for posting I;m just so excited!!

 

[seven]

We had 87 more kicks than handballs

Like to know McMahon stats, seemed to handball a lot in the game

 

[Lonthalion]

i only watched the last on tv and it seemed to me that the gameplan was chipping into the wind ala a few years back v Geelong

 

[tannerztigers]

Like to know McMahon stats, seemed to handball a lot in the game

13 kicks, 16 handballs, 6 marks, 4 tackles.

 

[seven]

13 kicks, 16 handballs, 6 marks, 4 tackles.

thanks.

 

[LeeToRainesToRoach]

We had 95 more marks! 95! is that a record? 157 - 62

Since 1988, the only time there's been a bigger difference was last year, R11 Brisbane v Port, when Brisbane had 98 more marks (172-74). Next biggest difference is 79 marks.

Port's strategy may have been to pressure us inside 50 and run off our forwards, who aren't perceived to be very hard-working when it comes to defence. If that was the plan, it came unstuck in a big way with us scoring 19 goals in three quarters.

 

[Broadsword95]

We had 87 more kicks than handballs

Ratio of 8:5 kicks to handballs. Good to see.

Extra possies doesn't mean much though - not with the way we fooled about at the end. Although, that said, I think we had something like 103 possessions to 56 in the 3rd term they said on the ABC, so perhaps I am doing the Tiges an injustice. Bit of both me thinks!

 

[stripes17]

What was the free kick count? I don't normallly whinge about umpiring, but they cost us a couple of goals. High to Brown etc NOT paid and a free to them in front which was Not high I thought. I had steam coming out of my ears!!

 

[JR8]

What was the free kick count? I don't normallly whinge about umpiring, but they cost us a couple of goals. High to Brown etc NOT paid and a free to them in front which was Not high I thought. I had steam coming out of my ears!!

18-16 in their favour, but its the ones those maggots missed.

 

[Tiger74]

18-16 in their favour, but its the ones those maggots missed.

Agreed, a few of our guys nearly lost their heads today, and don't get me started on the mark....

 

[AcKeR]

Umpires cost us 24pts today, push in the back on McGuane Motlop kicks goal. mark not paid to Tucky (no goal), round the neck to Brown (no goal) round the neck to Port Player (goal)

 

[tannerztigers]

Umpires cost us 24pts today, push in the back on McGuane Motlop kicks goal. mark not paid to Tucky (no goal), round the neck to Brown (no goal) round the neck to Port Player (goal)

But how many did we get from frees?