Spud | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Spud

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill James
  • Start date Start date
buzzman said:
number 18 was hard at it BUTTTTTTTT like 13 couldnt kick

If players considered to be "good kicks" had the same Goalkicking conversion rate as Andrew Kellaway (65.2%) then someone like Greg Tivendale would have kicked about 156 goals, not the 125 he actually ended up with.

For some reason a few people think Andrew Kellaway was a poor kick, he wasn't.
 
I feel as low this year as I did in Frawleys final year.

A whole year of waiting for a change. Too many years without a team to pin hopes on.

I can see in twenty years time, Frawley in the media boasting about being the one of the two coaches in almost 50 years to get us into finals.
 
David C said:
If players considered to be "good kicks" had the same Goalkicking conversion rate as Andrew Kellaway (65.2%) then someone like Greg Tivendale would have kicked about 156 goals, not the 125 he actually ended up with.

For some reason a few people think Andrew Kellaway was a poor kick, he wasn't.

a kellaway and gaspar were reasonable set shots, the problem wit these 2 and duncan is the fact that they were so slow to get ball to boot under pressure which meant they coffed it up too often. none of them could drill a 40 metre pass when the heat was on which is genrally not required when shooting for goal.
 
David C said:
If players considered to be "good kicks" had the same Goalkicking conversion rate as Andrew Kellaway (65.2%) then someone like Greg Tivendale would have kicked about 156 goals, not the 125 he actually ended up with.

For some reason a few people think Andrew Kellaway was a poor kick, he wasn't.

Maybe he should have been a forward. I wasn't talking about him kicking for goal, I was talking about him kicking to our guys in defence. He was a poor kick.
 
SkunkDen said:
knights, campbell, brodders were all good midfielders but all of them were slow, we had a one paced midfield which none were stars

agree with most of what you said skunk, but I've always rated Knighter as a star, a shining light in a dark era.
 
tigergollywog said:
agree with most of what you said skunk, but I've always rated Knighter as a star, a shining light in a dark era.

and fair enough too, he was a star for the RFC but many infront of him as a star of the competition