This isn't the 1st time i have heard this, so i looked at the ladder v top 8 & bottom 8, v bottom 8 they were 6-0 180%, v top 8 they were 4-3 93%.
These #'s indicate a big fall if they don't sort themselves out when the going gets tough.
The media jumping all over Port reminds me of them doing the same with Melbourne pre '19, v bottom 8 they went 11-1 178%, v top 8 2-6 83%
Its what annoys me, the average punter can see that Port can flog the bottom teams but they struggle to either small wins, or average wins and then big losses against the top teams. They have no consistency when playing the best teams but 6 out of 8 AFL pundits reckon they win the thing, they realise they have to beat 3 top teams in a row to do that. Their form doesn't show that they can do that.
It kind of goes along with the eyesight though, those less skilled but big and tough teams (like Port, big bulky mids, very powerful, powerful forwards etc) beat up pretty hard on teams down the bottom who are usually playing at least some kids (men vs boys type stuff) but their lack of foot skills hurts them. They have tried to address this with Butters, Rozee and to a lesser extent Duursma (who I don't think is as good a kick as the other 2 but gets all the attention due to the "arrow") but it remains to be seen if this is too little too late before their best players get too old.