-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Sunday Herald sun votes a disgrace.
- Thread starter itsintheblood
- Start date
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Did he say that L2R or are you reading his mind? Funny cos it wouldn't suprise me if he did have some sour grapes.
Better to have an even spread of 21 players plus Richo than have 4 or 5 standouts and the rest not pull their weight. We won and it was well deserved no matter who got the votes. Onya Tiges.
rosy23 said:
He said Essendon should have won the game, I'm just reading between the lines. The again, perhaps Sheeds was implying that Bradley would have been moved before quarter time if the match had been a final.
I think Mark Harding has just read the figures on the stats sheet: "OK, Richo was clearly BOG, who were the next four best ballwinners?"
rosy23 said:iitb said:Pettifer with 26 disposals and 3 goals didnt get a vote but 4 bummber players got in ahead of him and simmonds also. What a joke.
I wouldn't give Kayne a vote either and I bet he got a decent rocket at half time to get him going. He only had 4 touches in the first half and didn't lay a tackle for the entire game.
Which means he had 22 possessions in the second half. Phenominal. Shows he has got the kids when he applies himself. Heard got votes for a half of footy, why not Petts? (and Im not suggesting Petts is half the player Heard is by the way)
Probably reading the 11 kicks and then colum for total disposals (15) which'd add up to 26. Not having a tackle for a game though doesn't exactly mean you've played a bad game.
If it does, Hird shouldn't have got a vote, neither should Simmonds. Raines played in the back line, and didn't get one.
Lovett-Murray had 21 touches, and kicked 2 g 3 b.
I think the one reason that Pettifer shouldn't get a vote however, is because he told the umpire to Get a truck, and gave away a stupid 50m penalty.
If it does, Hird shouldn't have got a vote, neither should Simmonds. Raines played in the back line, and didn't get one.
Lovett-Murray had 21 touches, and kicked 2 g 3 b.
I think the one reason that Pettifer shouldn't get a vote however, is because he told the umpire to Get a truck, and gave away a stupid 50m penalty.
rosy23 said:iitb said:Pettifer with 26 disposals and 3 goals didnt get a vote but 4 bummber players got in ahead of him and simmonds also. What a joke.
I wouldn't give Kayne a vote either and I bet he got a decent rocket at half time to get him going. He only had 4 touches in the first half and didn't lay a tackle for the entire game.
I'd still give him a vote. His stats were pretty good.
rosy23 said:
Yeah he did but reckon that's just Sheedy BS. That man is the king of crap. From my reading between the lines he said that Bummers would have won the match but he felt is was more valuable for Bummers to lose and give Bradley the experience on Richo than to make a change and win the match. You could read it as the man talking rubbish again or maybe Sheedy is tanking for higher draft picks. He wouldn't do that, would he? He's the only guy who would tank and the come out and bag others for tanking to deflect away from his own tanking, telling everyone that he isn't tanking while he obviously is
... or am I talking like Sheedy? :crazy
... or did we win the game and Bummers didn't because we we the better team?
Somebody won and somebody lost and whoever the LOSER was it wasn't us.
Hird nearly won the game for them
Peverill was the best on baller - destroyed Tuck & Foley
Both deserved votes IMO
Richo won the game for us but should have kicked 10+ (poor kicking) - 9/5
Bummers could have pinched it had they kicked straight in the last qtr
Peverill was the best on baller - destroyed Tuck & Foley
Both deserved votes IMO
Richo won the game for us but should have kicked 10+ (poor kicking) - 9/5
Bummers could have pinched it had they kicked straight in the last qtr
Who do you think is better out of Fleming and Peverill. Interesting comparison someone threw up there i thought. I feel a poll coming on!!
Tango said:
Funny how whenever we lose and we don't kick straight, people say we've played badly and that's reflected in the votes. I agree peverill should have got votes, Hird maybe sneak in for one. He reminds me of when carey used to play a great 5 minutes and the media were saying how sensational he was etc and give him BOG
I simply can not stand Hird
what he said about richmond and campbell (last year)
I am glad he is playing next year
and I hope
I really hope that Hall lay's him out and richmond beat his soft side twice again!!
and yes the votes for this games is/was an disgrace
what he said about richmond and campbell (last year)
I am glad he is playing next year
and I hope
I really hope that Hall lay's him out and richmond beat his soft side twice again!!
and yes the votes for this games is/was an disgrace
Bengal said:
Given that Peverill has played 114 games (incl. 6 finals) and is in his sixth season compared to Fleming's 34 in two seasons, I don't think there's much doubt who has been the better player.