Talking Politics | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Talking Politics

If the LIberals are smart they'll choose someone like Dan Tehan for leader and not lightweight Angus Tayl;or.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
ABC reporter on Weekend Breakfast covering Labor's win in Hughes said the Libs had held it since 1996, which is apparently "nearly 20 years". He said it live to camera and in his pre-recorded voice-over.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users
He lost by 1200 votes, winner got 34%, he got 33%. I wouldn't call that kicked to the kerb. He did a great job. And unlike most MPs he has something big a worthwhile to hang his hat on, his negotiating and campaigning vastly improved housing policy. That can be objectively measured too based on budget increased as a direct result of his work. Great job Max, very passionate and committed young man who will succeed at whatever he does.
I reckon it was Chandler Mather's and the Greens treatment of Labor's housing policy that cost him and the Greens.

Renters needed assistance, Labor was trying to provide it, but the Greens played politics with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
If the LIberals are smart they'll choose someone like Dan Tehan for leader and not lightweight Angus Tayl;or.
Yes, I agree.

If Bridgit McKenzie hadn't lost her seat she would've been a good option, who would've got a lot of traction with voters. A fat chance of a female being the the leader of the Liberal party though.
 
Yes, I agree.

If Bridgit McKenzie hadn't lost her seat she would've been a good option, who would've got a lot of traction with voters. A fat chance of a female being the the leader of the Liberal party though.

You mean Bridget Archer? I've made the same mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Newscorp idiots refuse to learn
the result damages their brand and ideologies, it rubs their own poop in their faces

Aussies voted for stability, positivity, togetherness, calm, etc
something they know nothing about
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Yes, shame Archer lost. One of the few decent Liberals.

Dan Tehan is a charisma-free zone. Seeing as they can't win in 2028 maybe he's not a bad choice, to make whoever comes through after look appealing by comparison. Don't think that person is in parliament yet. Like I've been saying for years, Coalition politicians are the dregs of the Right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Will be interesting how Labor takes this.

From my point of view its the best of a fairly uninspiring bunch of political leadership -- short sighted policies with short term handouts to buy votes.

Messaging that its an overwhelming mandate will do my head in.

IMO - It clearly showed what most people are NOT interested in - overt racism and ultra stupid energy policy (nuclear). LNP preferencing one nation is repugnant. Trump style politics on those nose to most Australians.

i.e. it was a vote against something (which is super powerful), but not a strong vote FOR something

Personally I'd like wayyyyyy less welcome to country at the start of so many meetings. Two reasons - its a waste of time and resource - most people are just waiting for it to be over, and secondly it devalues it. Saving it for special occasions (IMO) makes it special and meaningful. Was I voting for the way it got pitched by the liberals - hell no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Yes, shame Archer lost. One of the few decent Liberals.

Dan Tehan is a charisma-free zone. Seeing as they can't win in 2028 maybe he's not a bad choice, to make whoever comes through after look appealing by comparison. Don't think that person is in parliament yet. Like I've been saying for years, Coalition politicians are the dregs of the Right.

Yeah he's not charismatic but he's a senior Liberal and they need a moderate to right the ship. Angus Taylor, Susan Ley or Andrew Hastie aint it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Newscorp idiots refuse to learn:

Australians have roundly rejected the Murdocracy for a while now in Australia. Fortunately his influence has waned & his aging audience is dying with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Personally I'd like wayyyyyy less welcome to country at the start of so many meetings. Two reasons - its a waste of time and resource - most people are just waiting for it to be over, and secondly it devalues it. Saving it for special occasions (IMO) makes it special and meaningful. Was I voting for the way it got pitched by the liberals - hell no.

Whether or not its performed too often isn't an issue for an election campaign.

That's the real issue here. Last ditch culture wars which gave only their hardcore voters a hard on, like Credlin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Australian Veterans certainly had a problem with rave parties on ANZAC day.

In regards to footy highjacking ANZAC day. Sheedy, who came up with the idea, had the full support and backing of Bruce Ruxton who was the President of the Victorian RSL.

Using Bruce Ruxton's endorsement as a case for anything is where you've gone wrong here.

Dunno why veterans would object to rave parties when Anzac Day has always been a good excuse for pub pissups and rampant gambling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Newscorp idiots refuse to learn:


The answer from Sky/NewsCorpse is always to swing further right and hope the voters go insane and follow.

They tried it in WA a couple of months back, didn't fly there either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Will be interesting how Labor takes this.

From my point of view its the best of a fairly uninspiring bunch of political leadership -- short sighted policies with short term handouts to buy votes.

Messaging that its an overwhelming mandate will do my head in.

IMO - It clearly showed what most people are NOT interested in - overt racism and ultra stupid energy policy (nuclear). LNP preferencing one nation is repugnant. Trump style politics on those nose to most Australians.

i.e. it was a vote against something (which is super powerful), but not a strong vote FOR something

Personally I'd like wayyyyyy less welcome to country at the start of so many meetings. Two reasons - its a waste of time and resource - most people are just waiting for it to be over, and secondly it devalues it. Saving it for special occasions (IMO) makes it special and meaningful. Was I voting for the way it got pitched by the liberals - hell no.
It’s an Acknowledgement of Country at your meetings, not a Welcome to Country. It takes about five seconds of your time.

And it’s not an election issue.
If you think there are too many at your work, talk to your boss
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users