Talking Politics | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Talking Politics

Chelsea said:
Turnbull would make an excellent Labor leader and I think it is a shame for him personally that he is a square peg trying to fit into a round hole, by staying with the Coalition.

i disagree. he may be socially 'progressive' (at least compared to many in the Libs), but economically he is on the Libs side.
 
Brodders17 said:
i disagree. he may be socially 'progressive' (at least compared to many in the Libs), but economically he is on the Libs side.

The leader of the new Socialist Liberal Party?
 
Pretty hard to get a handle on where the election is at. Diff media has different results and predictions. From what I can gather it looks like the coalition will get 73-76 and ALP 68-72. Coalition should be able to form government with a couple of conservative independents, may even scrape an outright majority of 1, but more likely slim minority government.
 
tigersnake said:
Pretty hard to get a handle on where the election is at. Diff media has different results and predictions. From what I can gather it looks like the coalition will get 73-76 and ALP 68-72. Coalition should be able to form government with a couple of conservative independents, may even scrape an outright majority of 1, but more likely slim minority government.

100% they have Katter (maybe even offer him the speakers role), so they only really need 75. Perhaps someone like Rosy can tell us which way McGowan would go... I suspect LNP, but don't know for certain. Obviously Bandt will go with Labor. I can't see how Labor can form a government unless they get to 73. If they do, then Xenophon will have a decision to make.

either way, if Turnbull is able to form a government, he's gonna have a really tough time getting legislation through... which is great news for those against bringing back the Building and Construction Commissioner, the company tax cut, etc.
 
Ian4 said:
....... Perhaps someone like Rosy can tell us which way McGowan would go... I suspect LNP, but don't know for certain. .......

Cathy is very clear she won't do a deal. She is there for the people of Indi and will always go for what is best for our electorate. When questioned she said she wouldn't be interested in and wouldn't accept the speaker role if it was offered to her. She is there for one reason and that's to represent Indi.
 
Ian4 said:
....... If they do, then Xenophon will have a decision to make.

......

I heard Nick interviewed and he clearly said he's willing to deal side with the Libs.
 
rosy3 said:
Cathy is very clear she won't do a deal. She is there for the people of Indi and will always go for what is best for our electorate. When questioned she said she wouldn't be interested in and wouldn't accept the speaker role if it was offered to her. She is there for one reason and that's to represent Indi.

you would hope as a member of the federal parliament she would also consider what is in the best interests of the country as a whole. which would include having a functioning (non-Lib) government.
 
You can remain independent, support the government insomuch as you don't block supply, and vote on your conscience on other bills. No problem with doing that as far as I'm concerned.
 
antman said:
You can remain independent, support the government insomuch as you don't block supply, and vote on your conscience on other bills. No problem with doing that as far as I'm concerned.

stating you wont block supply would be 'doing a deal' wouldn't it? i agree with the rest.
 
Brodders17 said:
you would hope as a member of the federal parliament she would also consider what is in the best interests of the country as a whole. which would include having a functioning (non-Lib) government.

Of course not all decicions involve Indi and reckon she is doing that by voting on merit regardless of which side it favours rather than for a party line. That is what independent means to me.
 
rosy3 said:
Cathy is very clear she won't do a deal. She is there for the people of Indi and will always go for what is best for our electorate. When questioned she said she wouldn't be interested in and wouldn't accept the speaker role if it was offered to her. She is there for one reason and that's to represent Indi.

I can't find the interview I heard but the audio here is similar.
 
Brodders17 said:
stating you wont block supply would be 'doing a deal' wouldn't it? i agree with the rest.

If you want to be technical - yes - but it's not a deal in the sense of agreeing to supporting all government legislation in return for certain concessions.

Clearly the two are different Brodders!
 
antman said:
If you want to be technical - yes - but it's not a deal in the sense of agreeing to supporting all government legislation in return for certain concessions.

Clearly the two are different Brodders!

More fundamental than technical IMO. showing your hand.

Fairfax has Lib 72 seats confirmed and in the lead in 1 for 73. ALP 67 confirmed and in the lead on 5 for 72. a couple of those leads could change and make it 1 or 2 more Lib and 1 or 2 less ALP
 
tigersnake said:
More fundamental than technical IMO. showing your hand.

Geez guys, it ain't hard to understand - an independent agreeing to side with the government on the cross-benches and vote with them on all legislation is completely different to undertaking not to block supply and voting on your conscience - these are very different things.

It's likely that all independents will undertake not to block supply regardless of who can form a government. That's not "doing a deal".

*shakes head*
 
antman said:
Geez guys, it ain't hard to understand - an independent agreeing to side with the government on the cross-benches and vote with them on all legislation is completely different to undertaking not to block supply and voting on your conscience - these are very different things.

It's likely that all independents will undertake not to block supply regardless of who can form a government. That's not "doing a deal".

*shakes head*

Its actually the opposite. Agreeing to not block supply is number 1. That is, as they say, the real deal. That was the Oakshott and Winsdor deal that took 17 days back in 2010, not block supply but retain independence on conscience matters.
 
tigersnake said:
Its actually the opposite. Agreeing to not block supply is number 1. That is, as they say, the real deal.

Only if you don't like who is government.

Agreeing not to block supply is allowing the government to govern and the country to run. It's not doing a deal.
 
Baloo said:
Only if you don't like who is government.

Agreeing not to block supply is allowing the government to govern and the country to run. It's not doing a deal.

serious?
 
tigersnake said:

Put it this way TS. Independents can come out right now and say "I will not block supply" before either side even attempts to form a government. Xenophon did this before the last (not this) election. Now you tell me how that is "doing a deal".

Anyways, sorry to be pedantic, but there you go. It's all a bit academic as independents who blocked supply (with the opposition of course) would be pretty on the nose. It's a radical move.
 
antman said:
Put it this way TS. Independents can come out right now and say "I will not block supply" before either side even attempts to form a government. Xenophon did this before the last (not this) election. Now you tell me how that is "doing a deal".

Anyways, sorry to be pedantic, but there you go. It's all a bit academic as independents who blocked supply (with the opposition of course) would be pretty on the nose. It's a radical move.

But its not pedantic, its fundamental. X man was in the senate last election, whole different shooting match.

The minority (Oakshott and Windsor in the past, X-party, Katter, Rosy's woman, Bandt) have something that the majority desperately needs. So desperate, that Abbott famously offered up 'his arse' last time around. Now call me a cynic ant, but as a long time student of politics, that seems to my pea brain to have political deal written all over it, in pretty big, dauby letters, in flouro paint.