tigertim said:Just did an early vote and expected one man and his dog there but its full on , just like a regular voting day and almost as busy. I read ladt week 660,000 had already voted.
Amen, 22.22nd Man said:I am very much in favour of explicit environment issues like this ....why we have rice farming at all in Australia is beyond me. 2.5 billion people who live on the stuff grow enough to feed themselves and export it to ocassionall eaters like us. Pakistani basmati over Aussie sun long any day of the week.
Don't start me on cotton farming in near arid climates.
Land clearing that is putting koalas on endangered lists in large parts of qld and Nsw.
To me these are things we can influence for our own benefit.
I think it's ok to get involved in politics early if your motives are good, and I think we can agree Plibersek's were. It's the careerist hacks or ambitious egotists that are the worry.22nd Man said:Plibersek was born in Sydney to Slovenian immigrant parents. She has degrees from the University of Technology Sydney and Macquarie University, and before entering parliament worked as a staffer for Senator Bruce Childs
Not a union official but a political animal from the day she enrolled at UTS. I do however think she has a lot of credibility... And is a great asset for the ALP. But talent doesn't preclude one from calling in favours once the election is won. I didn't say they will roll Shorten just that they will manipulate him..as you say the talent is way more smart than two kill Bill.
My old man was as working class as they came but had a strong preference for the right of poltics yet he said John Button was the best minister we ever had. PS he had dealings with Shirtens old man and his observations of him make it easy to understand why bill chooses to use his mother as a campaign weapon.
Yep.joegarra said:Vaccinations save lives , fact. Arguing against that is like saying 1 plus 1 isn't 2!
As an aside there was an article I read earlier in the week about an 17 year old in the US who was banned from going to school because he refused chicken pox vaccination over and over on religious grounds and he and his parents challenged it in court. The court action stopped and he was allowed back to school because just prior to the hearing he got chicken pox !!joegarra said:Vaccinations save lives , fact. Arguing against that is like saying 1 plus 1 isn't 2! As for Rachel Carling-Jenkins, I have so many stories from the last state election when we were both candidates for Werribee. Most I can only tell privately
Yep, and still another week to go. Roughly about 5% of the over 18 population have voted already.year of the tiger said:Over 1 million nationally I heard had already voted by Monday this past week.
Agree.22nd Man said:That is also bad. Never used to be the liberal way. And has definitely contributed to their shortcomings today. So a pox on anyone who has only ever worked in the political system and then goes into parliament (and I don't count working in a bar while doing a law degree a working class experience)
Apparently now 2 million have already voted.year of the tiger said:Over 1 million nationally I heard had already voted by Monday this past week.
tigertim said:Apparently now 2 million have already voted.
This is indeed landmark legislation. It represents an important landmark in Australia's transformation from an inward looking, monocultural society to an outward looking, tolerant, confident, multicultural society.
A restriction against incitements to racial violence and vilification is totally valid to ensure not so much absolute freedom of speech but fair speech, consistent with the values of tolerance and understanding.
Nothing alt-right or even hard right in his comments about Islam and Muslims in that speech. That part was very reasonable. He actually made the point of calling out the excesses of identity politics on the left and right end of the spectrum in that section. Not sure why that is considered alt-right.antman said:Sorry PT, that's incorrect. Compare Latham's speech from 1994 about Section 18C to what he says now.
From 1994:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/mark-loltham
Latham's got the right to change his stance on anything of course but to claim he hasn't changed is nonsense, even leaving aside that fact the he joined PHON. He's moved from progressive Left to hard Right- verging on alt-right. The sad truth is that Latham is a political opportunist - and he always was, even when I agreed with him.
Panthera Tigris said:Nothing alt-right or even hard right in his comments about Islam and Muslims in that speech. That part was very reasonable. He actually made the point of calling out the excesses of identity politics on the left and right end of the spectrum in that section. Not sure why that is considered alt-right.
easy said:Howard campaigns on the line that 'Shorten is coming for your nest egg'
so Keating counters 'Dutton is the nastiest piece of work in politics in 50 years and he'll be your PM'
:rofl
TT33 said:Is anyone else fed up to the back teeth with political advertising on the tv, thank goodness we only have to put up with it for1 more day.
K3 said:Especially with how much of them are full of... *smile*.
Why we don't have laws ensuring that what is 'put out there' is the truth is just beyond me.
TT33 said:Is anyone else fed up to the back teeth with political advertising on the tv, thank goodness we only have to put up with it for1 more day.