Not sure its that simple. Another person currently held OS wants no publicity. I'm sure a stack of work gets done behind the scenes and the people inthat you never hear of.
I imagine if they started down the noisy path and she was killed they'd be getting the blame for that. She says she's grateful but is she really?
At least her husband stuck by her.
There's a lot of speculation/amateur psychology going on here. An inquiry should be conducted that would hopefully shed more light on it.
1. I think there is 'a lot of speculation/amateur psychology going on here.' See post 1 above.
2. It seems quite likely you are referring to my post as yours immediately follows, along with others I suppose. So I expect you will take it upon yourself to similarly rebuke or advise every poster on PRE re any use of 'a lot of speculation/amateur psychology going on here.' Given most posts are opinionated i.e. speculative, that would keep you busy forever I'd say.
FWIW, I fully support an inquiry; but was offering an evidence-based and psychologically supported, possible explanation for the alleged victim's apparent willingness to meet with CP years later. An event that might lead some to speculate on her initial allegations, or doubt . Pertinent to the whole issue I would think.
See 2.5.2 in:
https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/resources/publications/en/guidelines_chap2.pdf
Rather than patronising others or seeking to become a self-appointed mod/censor or site nanny, perhaps just try to allow others the same freedom of expression you obviously grant yourself. See 1.