So, apparently we live in a representative democracy.
The idea of this system is that we each get to send a representative to parliament who is our voice in the parliament.
Everyone is in an electorate, and each electorate gets a representative.
Right?
Well, not right when you have cheats in power.
You may have heard about the motion in the House of Reps, which over-ruled the decision of the speaker, to send the issue of Christian Porter receiving brown bags of money to fund his lawyers, to the privileges committee.
Now, the government has a 1 seat majority. So, if you do the numbers, the vote on the floor of the House should have been a tie, and the speaker would have the casting vote. Make sense?
So how did the government get away with this? How did they win a motion without the casting vote of the speaker?
Simple, they cheated the people of 2 electorates out of their elected representative in parliament.
Buried in an article on the ABC site are some details:
That's right, stopping MPs from casting a vote, disenfranchising thousands of Australians because they voted the wrong person in as their local member.
This government and the parties they belong to, The Liberal and National Parties, will stop at nothing to cover up their own corruption.
This is the most corrupt government I've ever seen by a long shot, disenfranchising voters is so far beyond the pale. To do so in order to protect the corrupt activities of a member of the government is truly stunning.
Possibly even more stunning is how little coverage this has received, biased media? I reckon.
The full article is here: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10...n-hermit-kingdom-canberra-democracy/100559028
DS
The idea of this system is that we each get to send a representative to parliament who is our voice in the parliament.
Everyone is in an electorate, and each electorate gets a representative.
Right?
Well, not right when you have cheats in power.
You may have heard about the motion in the House of Reps, which over-ruled the decision of the speaker, to send the issue of Christian Porter receiving brown bags of money to fund his lawyers, to the privileges committee.
Now, the government has a 1 seat majority. So, if you do the numbers, the vote on the floor of the House should have been a tie, and the speaker would have the casting vote. Make sense?
So how did the government get away with this? How did they win a motion without the casting vote of the speaker?
Simple, they cheated the people of 2 electorates out of their elected representative in parliament.
Buried in an article on the ABC site are some details:
That was before the astonishing revelation emerged that the reason the government was able to defeat the vote to send the Porter matter to the Privileges Committee was because the government will not allow independent crossbenchers to vote remotely.
Haines says Dutton had told her it would be "impractical" for the government to include the votes of remote crossbenchers in divisions, despite the government doing so in the Senate since September 2020.
"The fact that MPs want to exercise their right to vote in parliament is not 'impractical'. It is a fundamental tenet of our democracy and parliament, and it is offensive to the constituents of the electorates represented on the crossbench," Haines said on Thursday.
"If the Leader of the House had not blocked the two crossbenchers participating in parliament remotely from casting their votes yesterday, the deciding vote yesterday may well have been with the Speaker."
Of course, the Speaker, Tony Smith, had told the House that he believed there was a prima facie case to be answered over the Porter donations and had urged the House to give precedence to referring the matter to the Committee.
So it would have been hard for him to have voted against the move.
Stopping MPs casting a vote.
Democracy: Hermit Kingdom style.
That's right, stopping MPs from casting a vote, disenfranchising thousands of Australians because they voted the wrong person in as their local member.
This government and the parties they belong to, The Liberal and National Parties, will stop at nothing to cover up their own corruption.
This is the most corrupt government I've ever seen by a long shot, disenfranchising voters is so far beyond the pale. To do so in order to protect the corrupt activities of a member of the government is truly stunning.
Possibly even more stunning is how little coverage this has received, biased media? I reckon.
The full article is here: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10...n-hermit-kingdom-canberra-democracy/100559028
DS
