Terry,s Post Game Comment | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Terry,s Post Game Comment

Which player has Terry got in his sights

  • Total voters
    86
  • Poll closed .
Same old spin doctoring to keep the wolves at bay and please the members, but in reality, all the hacks will be there come gameday. Will drop the standard 1 or 2 and leave his lovechilds to put up another inept performance. If Pies play with the same intensity as they did against Brisbane, we will receive and absolute shellacking!! Look for the ring a rosy runs!!!
 
Pettifer and McMahon for mine woeful absolutely woeful.

And this week its not just cos they are on my list they proved their weakness on Sunday.


And Tucks effort justified his re signing for 2 years ..................... not ::) , the exact reason i was cut when his premature signing was made ................... yet again poor management should Tuck have a *smile* year the club has him tied for 2 more years and cant move him on if they wish to.

All player signings should be conducted near years end of contracts not prematurely, it takes the pressure off to perform and provides the player with a comfort zone knowing they are safe.
 
craig said:
Pettifer and McMahon for mine woeful absolutely woeful.

And this week its not just cos they are on my list they proved their weakness on Sunday.


And Tucks effort justified his re signing for 2 years ..................... not ::) , the exact reason i was cut when his premature signing was made ................... yet again poor management should Tuck have a *smile* year the club has him tied for 2 more years and cant move him on if they wish to.

All player signings should be conducted near years end of contracts not prematurely, it takes the pressure off to perform and provides the player with a comfort zone knowing they are safe.
Click to expand...

Not so sure of that Craig. Plenty of players that are contracted have been traded. It gives clubs bargaining power if a player is contracted, otherwise if uncontracted a player can just nominate for the nd or psd and the club would get no return.
Being contracted guarantees nothing, they still need to perform.
 
Continuing with his usual weak as *smile* selections expect to see Johnson and Tivendale come back in this week for 2 kids.

Everyone knows Wallace is a *smile* artist. What a load of rubbish about respecting the jumper. Half our team have no urgency because they know our coach dosent have the balls to drop them
 
DirtyDogTiger said:
excuse my ignorance...what was terry's post game comment?
Click to expand...

Try this (R. Bartlett's reply) http://www.puntroadend.com/yabbse/index.php?topic=31211.msg744223#msg744223

and this http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23457896-11088,00.html
 
AstuteTiger said:
what misses would they be duro, you said that Richo should be dropped, when the game was there to be one in the first quater her missed 2-3 shoots at goal.

For your information richmond only kicked 1 behind in that 1st Q and by memory it was hughes who missed it directly in front again if ur going to post please do it with some sort of thought process.

Also how you can come up with "the game was there to be won in the 1st Q" is as puzzling as u saying richo missing 2-3 shots in the 1st Q.
Click to expand...




You might remember he kicked two that were out on the full!!!!
 
I didn't think the tiges were that bad actually - disappointing yes but not dreadful in a Melbourne sense. I think Petts needs to be dropped - he was pretty ordinary against Carlton and followed that up by being more ordinary against North.
 
Harry said:
Tambling played on the ball, had alot of TOG, was not tagged and was not tagging. What circumstances contributed to his low champion data points?
Click to expand...

No idea Harry, you're telling the story. According to Pro-stats he had 15 possessions, 4 marks, 6 ball gets (although all uncontested - equal most for the night), 2 clearances (equal most amazingly), 7 tackles (equal most - 4 not effective), 5 inside 50's (equal most) and 2 rebounds.

He's still only 21, missed most of his first season due to injury, why are some so harsh on the little guy?
 
Only read the first page a bit but one comment that he said was that the ten days was to long and the players had extra time to think about things well what the hell is the bloody head shrink we got from the AIS doing if that is the case.

Sorry if this has been mentioned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
< Cleve Hughes /Cleve's kicking [Merged] | To those Wallace Knockers >
Top Bottom