Tigers V Saints game day | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Tigers V Saints game day

TigerForce said:
Yep.

15% up on WC, and going by the way numbers work, any thrashings later in the season makes it harder to gain % than earlier in the season.

Funny how % works. We lost by to GWS by 2 points and lost 2.8%. We beat Saints by 54 points and only gained 2.9% :P

We are only 0.1% ahead of where we were before we lost to GWS.
 
Ridley said:
Funny how % works. We lost by to GWS by 2 points and lost 2.8%. We beat Saints by 54 points and only gained 2.9% :P

We are only 0.1% ahead of where we were before we lost to GWS.

Doesn't matter Riddles. Just get the 4 points and cement top 2 spot.
 
Ridley said:
Funny how % works. We lost by to GWS by 2 points and lost 2.8%. We beat Saints by 54 points and only gained 2.9% :P

We are only 0.1% ahead of where we were before we lost to GWS.

But it would be harder for anyone to run down.
 
Ridley said:
Funny how % works. We lost by to GWS by 2 points and lost 2.8%. We beat Saints by 54 points and only gained 2.9% :P

We are only 0.1% ahead of where we were before we lost to GWS.

Percentage change is all about how the percentage worked out on the "added" games only compares to the percentage before then.

Our percentage before the GWS game was 137.83.
Our percentage worked out on the GWS game alone (100*77/79) was 97.47 - less than 137.83 so it goes down, but not by alot because the 97.47 comes from one game but the 137.83 comes from 15 games so it carries more weight.
It went down to 135.03.
Same thing with the Aints game - based on that game alone it would be 100*111/57 = 194.74 so it goes up, but not by alot for the same reason - to 137.88.

Now, the percentage worked out on both those two games alone is 100*188/136 = 138.24.
This is slightly larger than the original 137.83 so it goes up but only by a small amount.
 
Baloo said:
Big call. He was Tiger Stripes Dyer once upon a time
Yeah I remember trailing behind him up Punt Road Hill on the way back to the car after the Ben Cousins game against Carlton. He's still a media so and so though ;D
 
Nomorewaiting said:
Dissapointing they stop Dimmas presser short.
Quite poor. Roaming Brian hogs all the time with this Ch 7 initiative. Crap. Angry.

Roaming Brain-dead went on and on and its indicative of how Ch7 is turning it into a kind of cheap info-tainment like morning TV.
then they give Dimma presser 2-3 minutes.
Weird wrong and stupid.
 
artball said:
Roaming Brain-dead went on and on and its indicative of how Ch7 is turning it into a kind of cheap info-tainment like morning TV.
then they give Dimma presser 2-3 minutes.
Weird wrong and stupid.

People tune in to watch roaming Brian.
The footy is irrelevant so are the coaches.
 
se7en said:
People tune in to watch roaming Brian.
The footy is irrelevant so are the coaches.

The state of the roaming Brian is a concern. It desperately needs a RB Committee to think tank it and bring in, let’s say Malcolm Blight. He’s a genius that guy. He’d probably sort it out by making Brian start in the same position and he can only go in certain zones.... oh, and wear a towel on his head
 
Baloo said:
That was just after his one handed mark under pressure when he was fending his opponent off with his other hand, or before?
:clap :clap

Kmac can do no right with some posters
 
Mac said:
The state of the roaming Brian is a concern. It desperately needs a RB Committee to think tank it and bring in, let’s say Malcolm Blight. He’s a genius that guy. He’d probably sort it out by making Brian start in the same position and he can only go in certain zones.... oh, and wear a towel on his head

Towel, or tin foil hat? Someone could hack his brain otherwise.
 
Mac said:
The state of the roaming Brian is a concern. It desperately needs a RB Committee to think tank it and bring in, let’s say Malcolm Blight. He’s a genius that guy. He’d probably sort it out by making Brian start in the same position and he can only go in certain zones.... oh, and wear a towel on his head

Roaming Blight?
 
bigwow said:
Nank just fresh aired roaming Brian, outstanding.

The thought police that is AFL will give Toby a please explain....cant do that stuff to the media. ::)
 
puntrd64 said:
Roaming Brian is going to stem the flow of ratings falling off the cliff. I think not

So very very true. The more they try, the more it looks like crap reality TV
 
I've never heard a coach be so complementary towards us and state how that's how they want to be as Richardson was towards us.

Unlike the sooks Scott brothers and others who have referred to us as ' them'.

Heard it today and gushed at times.
 
Nomorewaiting said:
I've never heard a coach be so complementary towards us and state how that's how they want to be as Richardson was towards us.

Unlike the sooks Scott brothers and others who have referred to us as ' them'.

Heard it today and gushed at times.

I’m not sure about Richo as a coach. But he seems to me a quality person and for that alone I hope he has some success.

He is the anti-Scott.