Phantom said:Tigerdog said:Ho'w this guys quoute. :spin
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10563
The Duke "As Jars would know, you can manipulate stats to work either for or against you. On the weekend, I heard them praising the tiggers for having 10 or so players who have played less than 35 games. I thought wow that's amazing. First thing I did when I got home was check out their playing list expecting 10 blokes under 20 years old. What I found was;
10 or so players IN THE TEAM ON THE DAY! Not on the list!
Then he goes on to list 3 out of 7 players that played that day. :clap
Hartigan - 21
Tuck - 24
*smile* - 21
Humm - 23
Moore - 22
Foley - 25
Roach - 20 in his 3rd year.
So my theory is we have a better list, although they too have some young talen, but ours are still much, much younger than their 'rookies' overall."
:rofl :welcome to living in denial for for 20 years. I don't recommend it.
I don't think Foley is 25. I recall watching him play U18s for the Falcons in 2003.
He's about the same age as Hartigan & Roach.
He is 21 is September, but most stats sites say he is 25 for some reason.Phantom said:Tigerdog said:Ho'w this guys quoute. :spin
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10563
The Duke "As Jars would know, you can manipulate stats to work either for or against you. On the weekend, I heard them praising the tiggers for having 10 or so players who have played less than 35 games. I thought wow that's amazing. First thing I did when I got home was check out their playing list expecting 10 blokes under 20 years old. What I found was;
10 or so players IN THE TEAM ON THE DAY! Not on the list!
Then he goes on to list 3 out of 7 players that played that day. :clap
Hartigan - 21
Tuck - 24
*smile* - 21
Humm - 23
Moore - 22
Foley - 25
Roach - 20 in his 3rd year.
So my theory is we have a better list, although they too have some young talen, but ours are still much, much younger than their 'rookies' overall."
:rofl :welcome to living in denial for for 20 years. I don't recommend it.
I don't think Foley is 25. I recall watching him play U18s for the Falcons in 2003.
He's about the same age as Hartigan & Roach.
just thought i would add some balance to their ramblings. as everyone knows im a fan of the kids. and the blues would do well to recognise the long term hacks on their list have to go. personally i hope they stay deluded for yrs to come.Tony Braxton-Hicks said:What's this? A positive post from Claw on a rival site?
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10563&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15&sid=957f905f394d0f33bb0bf92bfc237b15
Quote:
richmond have 20 players 21 or under on their list with another 10 under 25. they have very few players aged 24 thru 28 or players in their prime. with the right recruiting. in 3 yrs time when a good percentage of their juniors enter the 24 to 28 bracket they will have some sustained success.
artyfest
:grouphug
:hula
the claw said:just thought i would add some balance to their ramblings. as everyone knows im a fan of the kids. and the blues would do well to recognise the long term hacks on their list have to go. personally i hope they stay deluded for yrs to come.Tony Braxton-Hicks said:What's this? A positive post from Claw on a rival site?
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10563&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15&sid=957f905f394d0f33bb0bf92bfc237b15
Quote:
richmond have 20 players 21 or under on their list with another 10 under 25. they have very few players aged 24 thru 28 or players in their prime. with the right recruiting. in 3 yrs time when a good percentage of their juniors enter the 24 to 28 bracket they will have some sustained success.
artyfest
:grouphug
:hula
like phantom i think long term they are ok with talls they now need to find some quality onballers,i suppose iif they finish last gibbs will be a blue. one other thing i think in 3 yrs time they will be in a better position to trade than us for what they need mainly because the talls on their list will hold their value.
Tony Braxton-Hicks said:What's this? A positive post from Claw on a rival site?
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10563&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15&sid=957f905f394d0f33bb0bf92bfc237b15
Quote:
richmond have 20 players 21 or under on their list with another 10 under 25. they have very few players aged 24 thru 28 or players in their prime. with the right recruiting. in 3 yrs time when a good percentage of their juniors enter the 24 to 28 bracket they will have some sustained success.
artyfest
:grouphug
:hula