Today in the Sun.....Umps admit getting it wrong....AGAIN | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Today in the Sun.....Umps admit getting it wrong....AGAIN

One of the problems that the umpires have is their incorrect use of the whistle, especially since the concept of "advantage" has applied.

Hockey, soccer and rugby all have an advantage rule whereby a penalty is not applied until an offending team gains an advantage from a breach of the rules. The whistle is not blown when the breach occurs but rather when an advantage is obtained by the offending team and then the ball is brought back to where the breach occurred. The umpire/ref does not have to call anything out but might indicate by hand signals that the breach was spotted. Players always play on until they hear the whistle.

In football the umpires blow the whistle, some players will stop to see which way the umpire is pointing. Another player might believe that he has the advantage and play on. If he is correct, the umpire calls "play on, advantage" and the others who had stopped are further disadvantaged. If the player playing on is incorrect he gives away a 50-metre penalty (Richo in the Dreamtime game last year). If the umpires were instructed to use their whistles the way other sports do, they would save themselves a bit of energy on coaching instructions, be able to concentrate more on what they're there for and allow a more freely moving game to be enjoyed by players and spectators alike.
 
YinnarTiger said:
One of the problems that the umpires have is their incorrect use of the whistle, especially since the concept of "advantage" has applied.

Hockey, soccer and rugby all have an advantage rule whereby a penalty is not applied until an offending team gains an advantage from a breach of the rules. The whistle is not blown when the breach occurs but rather when an advantage is obtained by the offending team and then the ball is brought back to where the breach occurred. The umpire/ref does not have to call anything out but might indicate by hand signals that the breach was spotted. Players always play on until they hear the whistle.

In football the umpires blow the whistle, some players will stop to see which way the umpire is pointing. Another player might believe that he has the advantage and play on. If he is correct, the umpire calls "play on, advantage" and the others who had stopped are further disadvantaged. If the player playing on is incorrect he gives away a 50-metre penalty (Richo in the Dreamtime game last year). If the umpires were instructed to use their whistles the way other sports do, they would save themselves a bit of energy on coaching instructions, be able to concentrate more on what they're there for and allow a more freely moving game to be enjoyed by players and spectators alike.

Good point. There's no reason the umpires could signal a free kick (i.e. hand in the air) and then blow the whistle if there is no advantage.
 
They should go to the AFL musuem, pull out a 1908 rule book, read it, and umpire it the way the rules were written in the first place...

Over officiating every incidents is detracting from the game not adding too it.

Lets face it most of these silly rule changes haven't really resulted from anything other than poor interpretations of the rules in the first place. Look at the hands in the back and chopping of the arms interpretations these days. Seems to be a rule that only applies in the attacking 50 Metre arch.

How would guys like Sivagni and co go under todays rules.
 
gustiger12 said:
They should go to the AFL musuem, pull out a 1908 rule book, read it, and umpire it the way the rules were written in the first place...
Way to simple Gus.
Do the job you are paid to do and do it properly, poor bloody maggots wouldn't be able to prance around coaching, commentating, spectating and generally getting in the way.
We'd just about put Dimi, Insignificant, Geisch and the rules committee out to the retirement farm if they were forced to leave the rules alone and just get the maggots to umpire them properly.
 
can someone explain how the umpires are being asked to interpret the slinging rule amongst others, differently to what they and the players were shown as examples on the dvd.
 
No wonder we got the 'raw end of the stick' against the Cats ... one of the umpires was the one that Tucky cannoned into last year. He has only just returned from a major back injury as a result of the collision ... I'm sure he remembers which team it happened against!