Todays Game @ Canberra [MERGED] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Todays Game @ Canberra [MERGED]

Tigers of Old said:
Honest assessments of Deledio are refreshing.

Does "honest" mean what you want to read ToO. Wouldn't most people be giving honest appraisals from their own viewpoint but opinions vary because people see things differently?
 
rosy23 said:
Tigers of Old said:
Honest assessments of Deledio are refreshing.

Does "honest" mean what you want to read ToO.

Not sure why you're highlighting me but anyway..

'Honest' to me means posters calling it as they see it and not sugarcoating our players when there are areas of their game they feel they can improve.
Deledio isn't/shouldn't be less immune to criticisms than anyone else and that's how it should be.
He's had a charmed run with the supporters and rightly so, however he gets plenty of compliments on these boards and it's refreshing when someone points out that he's not perfect and there are aspects of his game that need improvement.
 
Tigers of Old said:
Not sure why you're highlighting me but anyway..

I wasn't highlighting you personally. I just used the quotinator in the way it's designed, to quote your comment I was referring to.

I just found it interesting that on a thread where many people gave their opinions you mentioned honest appraisals are refreshing. You answered my question in your previous post. Thank you. :)
 
Tigers of Old said:
Good article by TW on the RFC site which rounds up his thoughts from the game.

Interesting take on Moore's game, ToO. Moore could have done no more statistically. Different proposition in the real season but it's encouraging.
 
Dyer'ere said:
Tigers of Old said:
Good article by TW on the RFC site which rounds up his thoughts from the game.

Interesting take on Moore's game, ToO. Moore could have done no more statistically. Different proposition in the real season but it's encouraging.

Don't rate him that highly but it would be a real bonus to see Kel make it Jack. I think TW's hopeful too, he's sure giving him every opportunity.
Ideally he'll be our poor man's James Clement and able to play on the mobile mid sized forwards. We desperately need a player in defence who can play that negating role.
Could be a surprise inclusion come rnd 1...
 
Tigers of Old said:
Dyer'ere said:
Tigers of Old said:
Good article by TW on the RFC site which rounds up his thoughts from the game.

Interesting take on Moore's game, ToO. Moore could have done no more statistically. Different proposition in the real season but it's encouraging.

Don't rate him that highly but it would be a real bonus to see Kel make it Jack. I think TW's hopeful too, he's sure giving him every opportunity.
Ideally he'll be our poor man's James Clement and able to play on the mobile mid sized forwards. We desperately need a player in defence who can play that negating role.
Could be a surprise inclusion come rnd 1...

I really don't see the point in playing a poor man's James Clement! Would rather give the job to Bowden, Raines or Newman and at least get SOME offensive value as well.
 
Daigoro said:
Tigers of Old said:
Dyer'ere said:
Tigers of Old said:
Good article by TW on the RFC site which rounds up his thoughts from the game.

Interesting take on Moore's game, ToO. Moore could have done no more statistically. Different proposition in the real season but it's encouraging.

Don't rate him that highly but it would be a real bonus to see Kel make it Jack. I think TW's hopeful too, he's sure giving him every opportunity.
Ideally he'll be our poor man's James Clement and able to play on the mobile mid sized forwards. We desperately need a player in defence who can play that negating role.
Could be a surprise inclusion come rnd 1...

I really don't see the point in playing a poor man's James Clement! Would rather give the job to Bowden, Raines or Newman and at least get SOME offensive value as well.
I would almost have preferred to have kept D-Rod.