On what are you basing this early call gpb?geoffryprettyboy said:I have my suspicions about Connors, I don't think he will give us the return in the long run. Early to call I know, but I hope he isn't labelled the 'one trick pony'.
On what are you basing this early call gpb?geoffryprettyboy said:I have my suspicions about Connors, I don't think he will give us the return in the long run. Early to call I know, but I hope he isn't labelled the 'one trick pony'.
geoffryprettyboy said:I have my suspicions about Connors, I don't think he will give us the return in the long run. Early to call I know, but I hope he isn't labelled the 'one trick pony'.
Harry said:If (and it's a big if) he can get his fitness to a very high level, he will become our best player in a very short time. Heven't seen Cotchin yet, but there hasn't been a kid with so much class at our club for a very long time. The club should pull him from normal training and put him on a specific training regime that busts his gut each and every session to the point where he spews. He doesn't need any training with the ball, his skills are natural.
se7en said:Make you wonder what has happened to Tuck.
In his first year under Wallace he was fantastic but has quickly dropped off. Either he has lost interest or carring a injury.
craig said:Tucks re signing for 2 years so early was a huge error especially with a superdraft coming up this year, and the Tigers wont be able to delist him now if he has a shocking year thats one less kid.
Spot on bretto :clap :clap :clap :clap :clapBrettstigers said:Disagree with most of the comments about Tuck on this thread including your contract issue Craig for one reason. Bodyshape. We don't have players coming through with a comparable bodyshape to Tucks. Who else is going to play the ruck rover position? Cogs on one knee? Sugar/Hyde/Tivva - don't make me laugh.
We don't have any genuine grunty ruck-rovers coming through. They certainly won't have the mass and strength they need to compare to Tuck for the full length of that two year contract.
Hyde/McMahon/Tivva and Sugar I would be just as happy not seeing in the ones and Raines better find his feet this season or he can join that list.
Brettstigers said:Disagree with most of the comments about Tuck on this thread including your contract issue Craig for one reason. Bodyshape. We don't have players coming through with a comparable bodyshape to Tucks. Who else is going to play the ruck rover position?
geoffryprettyboy said:There was a game Coburg played last year that was telecasted on TV, the camera panned to the opposition huddle during one of the breaks, and heard the opposition coach tell his players that they had to watch out for Connors because he was tearing them apart and he specifically mentioned to them to "watch out for his one trick", and that was his famous trademark, show the ball to the opposition and then stepping the other way (the experts here get the drift).
Brettstigers said:Tragicaly the one thing, as always, this Richmond list isn't short of are players who could be delisted. The only argument is in trying to pick which of the mediocre players who haven't really produced is worth retaining over another mediocre player without an AFL standard game who hasn't really produced.
premiers08 said:I reckon you wouldn't get a taker for Rainse, Tuck or Hyde.
Petts might go to a team lacking a HFF but that's about it. Morton will make him look 2nd rate