First leg gets up.Just seeing the Tigers and Trump mentioned In the same sentence makes me feel sick
First leg gets up.Just seeing the Tigers and Trump mentioned In the same sentence makes me feel sick
Shows how much I know about bettingWould be a double, but no.
How anyone could re-elect this bunch of incompetents is beyond me.
DS
He doesn’t care. As long as he gets re-elected the fact that people get COVID is irrelevant to a narcissist like TrumpTrump’s campaign made stops nationwide. Coronavirus cases surged in his wake in at least five places.
A USA TODAY analysis shows county COVID-19 cases grew at a faster rate after at least five of Trump's rallies across three states since mid-August.www.usatoday.com
Trump’s campaign made stops nationwide. Coronavirus cases surged in his wake in at least five places.
A USA TODAY analysis shows county COVID-19 cases grew at a faster rate after at least five of Trump's rallies across three states since mid-August.www.usatoday.com
Senate is important but Democrats also need to be competing hard for State Houses as that is where the voter deregistration laws, the gerrymandering and the laws restricting abortion are passed. No challenge regarding Roe v Wade can go to the Supreme Court unless a state passes a law restricting/banning abortion and someone challenges it.
DS
True. The Republicans have really screwed the pooch - should have put distance between themselves and Trump a lot earlier.
They have arguably won though given the Supreme Court will be dominated by Republic appointees for a generation.
They have arguably won though given the Supreme Court will be dominated by Republic appointees for a generation.
Won in that area of government/institutions, yeah. You never know, the Dems could pull something shady like increase the size of the court and rebalance. The other thing that needs addressing is voter disenfranchising - but this will be tough too in red states.
It's a sad situation when inexperienced charlatans like Kananaugh and Barrett are appointed for totally partisan reasons - simply because they will do the bidding of the current president. The Dems always appointed progressive judges but at least they had long experience and were generally well respected in the profession.
I think I read that Barrett hadn't ever presided over a case. Anyone know if that is correct?
If so... debacle!
We're not going to have a socialist president, especially a female socialist president, we're not going to have it, we're not going to put up with it," he said.