Yeah , I like the way you think. I would also like to see rfc lodge a legal case against the afl. F… ‘em….they make Shiite up as they go along.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Umpire farce - Getting worse by the minute!
- Thread starter iLoVeNeWmAn
- Start date
If a punter or punters pushed a class action, and it had legs, the AFL would instruct the bookmakers to pay out on a Richmond win to shut the law suit down
I'm sure the AFL affiliated bookies would be open to the suggestions to work together with AFL to stop it.
Definitely more modern than me.
Interestingly Hardwick said tonight they were still trying to find out if the ARC had different vision, you would have thought the club would know how it worked.
Don't recall him saying they're asking if they had different vision. He said the club is seeking clarification. I think the AFL would be shitting themselves. They know they can't justify it.
That’s okay. I’m big enough to apologise if I see this fictitious extra footage.
Tuesday now, are the AFL ready to release the deep fake they are getting made up which shows the conclusive evidence yet? Weird that the ARC could overturn it in ten seconds but it's been five days and our small brains are obviously still not ready to comprehend this amazing footage.
This. How quickly did they make a decision in such an important game with such a tight scoreline. I've seen more time taken on decisions about whether the ball was a behind or OOB.
Dimma's point about it costing the club millions is an interesting one. Not sure millions is the impact but we will have been financially impacted by the AFL's wrongs of not following their own process. Hoping we are considering some form of legal challenge for compensation.
Can someone shed some light on Hipwoods run up for the goal after the quarter time siren (1st or 2nd, can't remember). How on earth was he considered to be on the line of the mark to goal. He gestures he's going to do the left footers arch, but run straight, no angle, completely off the mark, yet no play on, to bad, after the siren, and awarded a goal.
Gill is probably spending a $million getting the video footage CGI manipulated
*smile* cheating stevehocking bastard
I checked and he definitely said different vision, and then last night on Footy Classified Hutchy said there is absolutely different vision.
Hard to know what to believe at this point.
Yeah watched it again and Dimma said they've asked if there is another angle. I'm pretty sure Hutchinson doesn't know if there was or wasn't another angle and was just assuming that surely there must be. Seems at this stage that there isn't.
Every time there is acontroversial ARC they say there is different vision. Why isn't it on the screen amongst the "wall"
Believe nothing.
Our world can pick a bullshitter.
We are calling Gil and the afl bullshitters.
No different video required.
We all saw what happened and has happened since.
I do want the tigers to rage against these bullshitters though until they see they need to say they were wrong and robbed us of a win in a final, and broke their own rules and have been treating us differently to others.
We know Gil, we know.
Go tigers.
Our world can pick a bullshitter.
We are calling Gil and the afl bullshitters.
No different video required.
We all saw what happened and has happened since.
I do want the tigers to rage against these bullshitters though until they see they need to say they were wrong and robbed us of a win in a final, and broke their own rules and have been treating us differently to others.
We know Gil, we know.
Go tigers.
I have no idea, new vision is news to me. As I've said before I'm sure they (or at least they did up until 2020) don't show the vision the arc is looking at on the screen at the same time the are looking at it in real time but as far as I know they use the same cameras and footage.
I've never seen any footage available that wasn't shown on channel 7 apart from the lock off down the ground cameras used for coaching but I can't imagine they would be used for a review.
They needed a camera in the stands side on to the goals so they could sync the front on vision to the goal line. The transmitter in the ball will be best assuming it works.
I'd like to hear the goal umpire on the night's version of events. I have a feeling we won't see him again this year and he'll probably accidentally fall out of a hospital window.
