Again, I’ll state that I’m no fan of channel 9 (especially after the many golf fiascos there’s been) and no fan of McGuire the man either.
However, he’ s got a LOT more cache than boring old jumper wearing Bwuce has when it comes to covering a game of football. He raises much more interesting topics, is prepared to voice his opinion on them, and isn’t afraid of the authorities (i.e. the AFL) like the dweeble little Bwucey is. McGuire is prepared to go the “scandal” route whereas Bwuce would prefer to talk about the mundane e.g. how McLeod has kicked 3.3 over the last 3 games from outside 50m on the left hand side of the ground. Booooring !!!
At the end of the day the networks will put on a well performed controversial commentator with something to say – irrespective of whether the public like him/her or not – over a well performed but static performer. This is because the networks want the audience to experience an emotion, even if its dislike. Nobody on this forum can tell me that McGuire doesn’t create an emotion (good or bad). Bwuce creates no emotion and it is for that reason I wouldn’t be surprised if the execs at 7 don’t give him the prominence that you are all expecting.
9’s commentary teams poo all over ANYTHING 7 has ever come up with. Let me remind you of some of the 7 commentators of relatively recent past: Morphet (oh, my God), McKenna (they dragged him straight off the Thunderbirds I’m sure), Robertson (a non-entity if there’s ever been one), Don Scott (ha hah hah….), Sandy Roberts (“he’s put that in the Mayor’s office”), Graeme Cornes (ha hah hah…), Dipper (hah hah hah…), Dermott (they too have employed him), KB (sooooooft !), Commetti is about the only decent one I can think of. Hey, maybe they’ll bring on Gordon Bray !! Yeeeee-haaaa !!
You’re just getting over-excited about the demise of the evil empire and its mouthpiece - which is understandable. Once boring old Bwuce gets a year of anchoring back under his belt you’ll all again be moaning about the fact 7’s coverage lacks spark – the very thing they lacked for the 40 years that they had football beforehand.
However, he’ s got a LOT more cache than boring old jumper wearing Bwuce has when it comes to covering a game of football. He raises much more interesting topics, is prepared to voice his opinion on them, and isn’t afraid of the authorities (i.e. the AFL) like the dweeble little Bwucey is. McGuire is prepared to go the “scandal” route whereas Bwuce would prefer to talk about the mundane e.g. how McLeod has kicked 3.3 over the last 3 games from outside 50m on the left hand side of the ground. Booooring !!!
At the end of the day the networks will put on a well performed controversial commentator with something to say – irrespective of whether the public like him/her or not – over a well performed but static performer. This is because the networks want the audience to experience an emotion, even if its dislike. Nobody on this forum can tell me that McGuire doesn’t create an emotion (good or bad). Bwuce creates no emotion and it is for that reason I wouldn’t be surprised if the execs at 7 don’t give him the prominence that you are all expecting.
9’s commentary teams poo all over ANYTHING 7 has ever come up with. Let me remind you of some of the 7 commentators of relatively recent past: Morphet (oh, my God), McKenna (they dragged him straight off the Thunderbirds I’m sure), Robertson (a non-entity if there’s ever been one), Don Scott (ha hah hah….), Sandy Roberts (“he’s put that in the Mayor’s office”), Graeme Cornes (ha hah hah…), Dipper (hah hah hah…), Dermott (they too have employed him), KB (sooooooft !), Commetti is about the only decent one I can think of. Hey, maybe they’ll bring on Gordon Bray !! Yeeeee-haaaa !!
You’re just getting over-excited about the demise of the evil empire and its mouthpiece - which is understandable. Once boring old Bwuce gets a year of anchoring back under his belt you’ll all again be moaning about the fact 7’s coverage lacks spark – the very thing they lacked for the 40 years that they had football beforehand.