There was also an article last week on the afl site where all new recruits were ranked. Who knows what data they used as tarantula was right down the bottom behind hopper. Travesty.
That was AFL Player Ratings for Round 1.
I'm not sure who their supplier is, but definitely need to find out where they're getting their stuff from .
Must be Aaron Rodgers 'ayahuasca' psychedelic type stuff, heard that's pretty good stuff man
Now if Jack Riewoldt is rated highest for Richmond last week, that rating system is definitely on something strong!!

Ben Miller had a better game than Daniel Rioli and Taranto

This is even more disturbing with their rating system

Taranto - 32 disposals, 18 kicks, 14 handballs, 3 marks, 8 tackles, 5 total clearances, 23 Pressure Acts, 542 metres gained.
Fisher - 7 disposals, 1 goal, 5 kicks, 2 handballs, 1 mark, 0 tackles, 1 total clearance, !0 Pressure Acts, 159 metres gained gets U 7 Ratings Points.
Silvagni - 5 disposals, 2 kicks, 3 handballs, 2 marks, 2 tackles, 2 hit outs, 1 total clearance, 11 Pressure Acts, 53 metres gained.
Apart from kicking a goal each to Tim's zero, and a couple of hit outs to Silvagni, he smashes them in every facet of the game.
Now in what world are the ratings of 7 for Taranto equal Fisher's game of 7 and Silvagni getting a touch below him with a 6!!
32 disposals to SOS 5, 8 tackles to 2, 5 clearances to 1, 23 PA's to 11, 53 metres gained to 542?

What world man?
