West Coast | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

West Coast

Richmond accuracy since 1993, with AFL ranking and ranking of the premiers (rushed behinds excluded):

Year Acc Rank PRank
1993 52% 15th 2nd
1994 55% 11th 14th
1995 57% 8th 11th
1996 59% 8th 10th
1997 58% 6th 14th
1998 58% 7th 9th
1999 59% 10th 1st
2000 60% 11th 8th
2001 60% 7th 15th
2002 55% 15th 8th
2003 59% 8th 9th
2004 57% 10th 2nd
2005 59% 12th 15th
2006 56% 13th 11th
2007 58% 8th
 
Dyer'ere said:
It's amazing how little there is on it, Disco. Not even on Wiki.

I think that's because you're spelling it wrong Dyer'maker. I think it's feldenkrais.
 
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Richmond accuracy since 1993, with AFL ranking and ranking of the premiers (rushed behinds excluded):

Year Acc Rank PRank
1993 52% 15th 2nd
1994 55% 11th 14th
1995 57% 8th 11th
1996 59% 8th 10th
1997 58% 6th 14th
1998 58% 7th 9th
1999 59% 10th 1st
2000 60% 11th 8th
2001 60% 7th 15th
2002 55% 15th 8th
2003 59% 8th 9th
2004 57% 10th 2nd
2005 59% 12th 15th
2006 56% 13th 11th
2007 58% 8th

Thanks L2R.
Hard to draw any conclusions from that. :headscratch
 
Tigers of Old said:
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Richmond accuracy since 1993, with AFL ranking and ranking of the premiers (rushed behinds excluded):

Year Acc Rank PRank
1993 52% 15th 2nd
1994 55% 11th 14th
1995 57% 8th 11th
1996 59% 8th 10th
1997 58% 6th 14th
1998 58% 7th 9th
1999 59% 10th 1st
2000 60% 11th 8th
2001 60% 7th 15th
2002 55% 15th 8th
2003 59% 8th 9th
2004 57% 10th 2nd
2005 59% 12th 15th
2006 56% 13th 11th
2007 58% 8th

Thanks L2R.
Hard to draw any conclusions from that. :headscratch

Easy conclusion, we average 9th over the years, cause thats the number the Tiges like the best.
 
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Richmond accuracy since 1993, with AFL ranking and ranking of the premiers (rushed behinds excluded):

Year Acc Rank PRank
1993 52% 15th 2nd
1994 55% 11th 14th
1995 57% 8th 11th
1996 59% 8th 10th
1997 58% 6th 14th
1998 58% 7th 9th
1999 59% 10th 1st
2000 60% 11th 8th
2001 60% 7th 15th
2002 55% 15th 8th
2003 59% 8th 9th
2004 57% 10th 2nd
2005 59% 12th 15th
2006 56% 13th 11th
2007 58% 8th

between you and phantom we have the undisputed stats kings on the net

where do you get all this L2r2r?
 
DirtyDogTiger said:
between you and phantom we have the undisputed stats kings on the net

where do you get all this L2r2r?

:hihi

Database compiled from the stats on various websites and a couple of books. Easy enough to crunch the numbers once you have the data.

BTW, anyone is welcome to a copy. To get anything useful or interesting from it, you'd need Microsoft Access software and a working knowledge of how to create database queries as I'm unable to provide tech support for it; otherwise it's just a mass of raw data.
 
I believe looking at the stats for accuracy for goal kicking should not be read in isolation.

We need to factor number of 'set shots' vs 'in play'
Also need to look at from 'where' are we kicking from.

If the set shots are from a position where we have not been doing too well, we need to look at things such as placement of kicks into forward line.

Are we going to those positions because of poor skills by midfield, poor deleivery into fowards due to the pressure on midfield, or is it due to poor leading techniques by the forwards? and then again is it because the defenders are forcing the forwards to lead into areas with poor conversion rates?

I would prefer for Richmond to look at more the delivery skills in general than just those going for goal scoring. Afterall, kicking for goal is aiming for between posts, general foot passing is designed to hit a smaller target, if we can start hitting the smaller target, we might be ablt to hit the big target between the posts.
 
Disco08 said:
I sent an email to the Tiges a few years ago with some advice for Richo about his goalkicking problems

Don't run in so close to the man on the mark. I could teach Richo that for free ;)
 
Disco08 said:
I sent an email to the Tiges a few years ago with some advice for Richo about his goalkicking problems based on visualisation and mental technique. Having taught alot of golf (the ultimate mental sport) I think alot of the techniques carry over, especially with set shots for goal. Never heard back though and obviously didn't really help if he read it lol.

Disco do you fancy a trip to Thailand. I could do with a few Golf Lessons. I am sure Tigers of Old would benefit from a few as well from what I have heard. ;)
 
Our biggest problem in gaining value from the experts is that they just blowpast and give a five second presentation never to be seen again.
The only way to get functional improvement is to use these types of people on a regular and consistent basis.
Golfers don't go to the coaches for one or two lessons they refer back to them consistently.
We need to put far more emphasis on tackling training suitable to AFL with a dedicated tackling coach.
In rugby they wrap up a player to stop him, in AFL it would just result in a ball up. We need to take the arm in a tackle so that players are unable to dispose of the ball correctly resulting in a turnover.
With our goal kicking the forwards also need extra coaching in both repetiitve technique and focusing/ visualising on the target. Half the guys look like they are more worried about stuffing the shot than actually focusing on how they need to complete the shot.
 
TigerMasochist said:
Our biggest problem in gaining value from the experts is that they just blowpast and give a five second presentation never to be seen again.
The only way to get functional improvement is to use these types of people on a regular and consistent basis.
Golfers don't go to the coaches for one or two lessons they refer back to them consistently.

Interesting points. Maybe the clubs have these people in partly for variety, to prevent the message from the club's coaches getting stale. Otherwise it'd make more sense to send e.g. Jade Rawlings to see Dave Aldred.
 
Inaccuracy is often the result of a good defensive game plan. I often look at the goal chart on the AFL website early in the match to see where the goals are being kicked from.

If a team is ahead early but has snagged a lot of goals from deep out wide then often they will end up losing the game to a team that has kicked points from the central corridor because it is difficult to keep the accuracy up from long and wide.
 
Disco08 said:
Dyer'ere said:
It's amazing how little there is on it, Disco. Not even on Wiki.

I think that's because you're spelling it wrong Dyer'maker. I think it's feldenkrais.

Thanks Disco. This stuff is gold.
 
Thanks for doing that search Redan - saved me going looking.

I thought there was something familiar about the name Aldred and kicking technique - in relation to RFC, that is.
 
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
hihi

Database compiled from the stats on various websites and a couple of books. Easy enough to crunch the numbers once you have the data.
can i ask you for a stat l2r2

which players have had the most holdingthe ball decisions payed against them/

i'm betting A Raines is in the top 5