What makes a good season??? | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

What makes a good season???

Well done people, some really good ideas.

Let's get our finances strong and hopefulyl have Coburg pushing for a flag which means our youngsters are coming along nicely.
 
Talking finances and getting 30 000 members, it was good to hear Pat Bowden spruiking (sp?) for everyone to buy their memberships yesterday.
 
another thing which always makes me happy is a crisis at Collingwood. that makes for a pretty good year!
 
Pre season Premiership
Home & Away premiership
Brownlow medalist
Coleman medalist
Norm smith medalist
Rising star

that about covers it......
 
TOT70 said:
This is what a successful 2006 season would look like for me:

     The senior team is competitive every week.  They win a fair share of games against similar middle of the ladder teams and pushes the stronger teams, with an occasional win against top 5 or 6 teams.

     The senior team wins easily against weaker teams or teams decimated by injury.

      Nobody blows the seniors away.

     Several youngsters play a few games each.  Two or three youngsters secure a senior position by the end of the year, at the expense of older players who are relegated to providing depth.

     Coburg play finals, on the back of performances by Richmond-listed players. 

      McGuane, Jackson, Hughes, JON, Polo, Casserly, White, Limbach, Thursfield, Roach, Foley and Humm form the basis of a strong VFL team and each get a taste of the big time.

     We end up with 30,000 members, consolidate our sponsors and find at least one more major sponsorship deal.

     We are able to go into 2007 on a level playing field with a full squad of 44 players.


If we make finals it will be a huge bonus but I don't believe that is as important as the other things listed above.



Agree with you here TOT70. Good post.
 
Phantom said:
Excellent question.

At our cricket club we set 5 goals each season, and judge our performance on attaining them. This last season we got 4 of 5. Not bad, but would have liked all 5.

I suggest the following goals:

1. To participate in finals.

2. To achieve profit, and reduce debt.

3. To increase club membership, and supporter participation.

4. To strengthen its bond with sister clubs, ie Coburg, Calder & RCC.

5. To build an alliance with an international sporting body.

great idea phantom, but i disagree with the one i highlighted in yellow. i think we should cut ties with the richmond cricket club. we need punt road to ourselves instead of finding places to train during the summer (this is what most of the other vic clubs have done)
 
To be competitive in every game (well most games, anyway)
To sing the "Yellow & Black" more often than not
In the games we lose to see the team fight them out
To feel some possible excitement in August that we could have some September action and not the usual despair just "playing out the season with no hope"
The shape of tomorrow starts with what we do today...
 
Ian4 said:
Phantom said:
Excellent question.

At our cricket club we set 5 goals each season, and judge our performance on attaining them. This last season we got 4 of 5. Not bad, but would have liked all 5.

I suggest the following goals:

1. To participate in finals.

2. To achieve profit, and reduce debt.

3. To increase club membership, and supporter participation.

4. To strengthen its bond with sister clubs, ie Coburg, Calder & RCC.

5. To build an alliance with an international sporting body.

great idea phantom, but i disagree with the one i highlighted in yellow. i think we should cut ties with the richmond cricket club. we need punt road to ourselves instead of finding places to train during the summer (this is what most of the other vic clubs have done)

Interesting point.

Personally, I'd be disappointed.
The Richmond Cricket Club has been & is a very important part of the Tiger heritage.
Names like Bill Jonston & Doug Ring, from the past, and Graham Yallop, Jim Higgs & Paul Rieffel, from more recent times. Many of us still have a tear in our eye when we think of Paul Melville.

One of the great reforms of Jim Malone was to build the Tiger Museum at Punt Road and Ron Rieffel, Paul's father and a Tiger in his own right, was a key player in that process. There is a large %age of Tiger supporters who feel very strongly about the RCC, and it would alienate many supporters if the RFC severed ties with it.

It's not in the interest of the football club to disenfranchise portions of its membership base.

As said before, finding a new home for the RCC is my preferred option, and the 3 options, in my mind, would be alternatively the Richmond City Reserve, or the Burnley Oval, or Kevin Bartlett Sporing & Recreation Complex area. All 3 areas are a part of Richmond, and would help to preserve the heritage. A merger between the RCC and one of the local Richmond clubs might provide a solution.

A lesser option would be to merge the RCC with the Coburg CC, so that the two could share the cricket facilities at the Coburg Oval, and this would free up Punt Road for use, as a football ground, for RFC, Coburg & Calder. This would strengthen ties between all 3 clubs.

I hear that the South Melbourne CC is going out to Cranbourne next season.

It is not surprising to me that the strongest cricket clubs in the VCA are StKilda, Melbourne, Carlton & Melbourne Uni, with the Tiges just marginally behind. All these clubs have a strong heritage and connection to their grounds.

Whichever way, the RFC should be working to build or maintain bonds with clubs that it already has an alliance with.

As an aside, the RCC should be working itself to build its profile. Just as the RFC has worked with the MCC to get a better deal at the MCG, eg MCC Tigers, so the RCC should be working to get a similar arrangement. I'm a MCC member, and if the RCC organised a MCC Tiger deal with unspecified benefits, well, if the RFC cast the RCC adrift, well, many of us might be tempted to be MCC Tigers through the RCC instead. But that's the negative, we all prefer the positive.

The main point is that both the RFC & the RCC should be working to build bonds, not to tear them down. And if an amicable solution can be found that provides a win-win, then the better for all.