Dyer Disciple said:The truth is generally a compromise. They had some bad injuries, yet were clearly inept. Watching Essendon these days often reminds me of us, sure when they are on song they look exciting, so did we the last half of last year.
I've had a lot of conversations with Knightsy over the years growing up in the same area locally and having some similar haunts, he has a switched on footy brain. Yet it surprises me how quick people have been to jump on the bandwagon of Essendon's list and his coaching ability.
I don't rate their list for the future other than the usual promising minority of kids most clubs have and I don't believe in judging coaches so early. Knights is a impressive character and he was always going to stamp his strong values and leadership on the club and give it a breath of fresh air after they failed to change the wallpaper in 27 years.
However some chinks in his coaching on game day are showing, the true mark of a good coach will be if he can evolve and develop.
I've heard while happy with him Essendon will not extend his contract this year but they will give him a payrise (he is contracted till end of next year).
Yeah, I tend to agree. I haven’t seen our game against them yet but just watching their earlier games they seem to be doing a lot of gambling that’s was paying off and catching teams by surprise. But I didn’t get the impression they were a really sound team, a good team that wins the contested ball and who runs hard the other way will beat them like they crush us (their work ethic is much better than Terry’s Tigers though). I’ll be surprised if they win that race for the last 8 spot.
I’m also not convinced by this argument that they are really young. Their players on average had 90 games of AFL experience on Saturday’s game and if you look at the core of the team it’s mainly guys drafted 2004 or before.