Just wondered what people thought of the decision where Gehrig marked the ball inside 50 and was marked by Newman. Newman put his hands up rather than impede Gehrig and risk a 50 metre penalty only to have Gehrig shove him in the chest and run off and kick a goal. it did not appear that Gehrig went back or was made to go back and kick over the mark.
What was Newman to do as it would have been highly likely if he grabbed Gehrig he would have got 50 awarded against him as he was not in the marking contest.
Should Gehrig have been forced to go back over the mark given that play had stopped albeit momentarily.
Whats your thoughts.
Although on the other hand I did notice a couple of our players get caught out in similar situations where we seemed to switch off after a mark or free kick only to have a Saints player run on and create a play. Notice Harvey do this to Howat a couple of times. Inexperience maybe.
What was Newman to do as it would have been highly likely if he grabbed Gehrig he would have got 50 awarded against him as he was not in the marking contest.
Should Gehrig have been forced to go back over the mark given that play had stopped albeit momentarily.
Whats your thoughts.
Although on the other hand I did notice a couple of our players get caught out in similar situations where we seemed to switch off after a mark or free kick only to have a Saints player run on and create a play. Notice Harvey do this to Howat a couple of times. Inexperience maybe.