Yeah I am hoping that we delist a couple more so we can use pick 67 and PSD #1
Would be quite happy if one was used on Wilkes (hopefully pick 67)
Would be quite happy if one was used on Wilkes (hopefully pick 67)
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Where does the list sit after the trade week, and what are our options.
- Thread starter pahoffm
- Start date
correct but better to have a lot of talls around the same age than none at ball. at least you solve your problem down the track rather than still be in the probem down the track.Col.W.Kurtz said:
it seems no one has a problem loading up with smalls mediums all around the same age but dont want to load up with talls when good ones are even harder to find.
due to terrible list management we have age gaps in our list theres not a lot you can do about it so we have to live with it. taking players because they fit a certain age bracket is fraught with danger. you take them because of their ability.
the claw said:
It is easier to find role for small mids because there are more of them on the field at any one time and they are more flexible in use. JR, Schulz and Hughes are not helped by the fact they are essentially competing for the same spot. It's not a huge issue though, no reason to not draft people.
if jr schulz and hughes are good enough theres 2 possies there for them now chf and third tall option if they are versatile theres also third tall in defence available. look at wce they have 7 kpd theres only a place for 3 in the team. 6 kpf again theres only room for 3 in the team they have just 2 ruckmen its here where they are deficient.Col.W.Kurtz said:
with rookies they have 17 190cm+ players and yet they are still deficient in one area ruckmen. 7 of their talls are very much development players its here where they will continue to turn over their talls those that show enough are kept those that dont are delisted traded. you also get the odd one who is good enough but cant get a regular game so hes traded and you guessed it for a earlyish pick.
the claw said:
They do have the advantage though that they can distribute their talls throughout the WAFL and they don’t have to worry about two guys in one position at the Burg. But as I said, it’s not a huge issue.
Phantom said:
To bad he wouldn't last to 67
I'd be happy to use PSD #1 on Wilkes provided there wasn't anyone better, I would still like to use 67 in this draft
When is the nomination of PSD???
Please refer to the linked list of dates.
http://www.puntroadend.com/yabbse/index.php?topic=28730.0
To be of best advantage to the RFC, Wilkes would be best nominating straight after the National Draft on November 24th, and before the next deadline of December 7th, 2pm, if he is able to do so.
This would mean he can prevented from being picked up earlier than our PSD #1, and can be taken on PSD day, on December 11.
http://www.puntroadend.com/yabbse/index.php?topic=28730.0
To be of best advantage to the RFC, Wilkes would be best nominating straight after the National Draft on November 24th, and before the next deadline of December 7th, 2pm, if he is able to do so.
This would mean he can prevented from being picked up earlier than our PSD #1, and can be taken on PSD day, on December 11.
Ghost of Punt Road
Tiger Champion
I'm really not an expert, but if Wilkes couldn't crack it for a game, is he really the bloke we are after?
It seems we would be banking solely on the fact talls take longer to develop.
It seems we would be banking solely on the fact talls take longer to develop.
I am not sure we have done enough? Who is happy with what we achieved this year? We needed to be more aggressive rather than chase Chris Juda$ he never really considered us the PRICK. >
Where are these guys taking us.
Tivendale? Hyde? Jon? Schulz? Meyer? White?
We could do with a Proper Full back, not Bowden.
Another ruck, I am worried about Simmo?
More midfielders, with good foot skills.
Another coach? :hihi :hihi :hihi
Where are these guys taking us.
Tivendale? Hyde? Jon? Schulz? Meyer? White?
We could do with a Proper Full back, not Bowden.
Another ruck, I am worried about Simmo?
More midfielders, with good foot skills.
Another coach? :hihi :hihi :hihi
Yep.
Jamie McNamara's WAFL Colts stats were regularly over the 30 possie mark. Got over 40 on a couple of occassions. Didn't get much TOG in the carnival which counted against him come draft time last year.
Very similar scenario to Callum Leslie this year. Callum has picked up a heap of possies at WAFL Colts level this year but got left out of the WA carnival team. I think that was more of a reflection of how good the WA juniors are this year.
Callum is shorter than McNamara.
Mind you, the Tigers needs are in the opposite end of the height scale to these two. Callum Leslie could be a rookie opportunity but that would be at the expense of one of the Coburg smalls - Horne, Carnell, et al.
Jamie McNamara's WAFL Colts stats were regularly over the 30 possie mark. Got over 40 on a couple of occassions. Didn't get much TOG in the carnival which counted against him come draft time last year.
Very similar scenario to Callum Leslie this year. Callum has picked up a heap of possies at WAFL Colts level this year but got left out of the WA carnival team. I think that was more of a reflection of how good the WA juniors are this year.
Callum is shorter than McNamara.
Mind you, the Tigers needs are in the opposite end of the height scale to these two. Callum Leslie could be a rookie opportunity but that would be at the expense of one of the Coburg smalls - Horne, Carnell, et al.
I get the feeling that we have a couple of smokies out there somewhere? I could be wrong but it wouldn't surprise me if we did. If we do and you know who they are please don't name them!