Who do you see as our inside midfielders this year? | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Who do you see as our inside midfielders this year?

Disco08 said:
If Collard was available with pick 1 in the rookie draft and they think they can overcome his issues then he'd be hard to pass up. He was very impressive in a much stronger junior crop last year. Not sure that McGinnity is as much a ball winner as a tagger really either.
Probably why people are putting Collards' name up (me included, only copying the rest ;D)
More upside than McGinnity then, but more of a gamble too
Thanks for your views Duckman
 
willo said:
More upside than McGinnity then, but more of a gamble too

Yeah definitely IMO. McGinnity would also be competing with Polo and Jackson for essentially one spot, maybe two.
 
My centre square start up would be:

Simmonds Cogs Foley and Jacko

Second rotation

Pattison Polo Raines Tambling

Back ups Tuck & Johnson

Young guns in development mode Connors Edwards Cotchin. Finishers to include Newman and Morton
 
newman will never be a total inside mid, he is a little inside & a little outside, he has good skills and chases and tackles

we dont need 3 inside mids in there at once, you need a combination of ball winning, ball recieving and ball carrying & delivering

foley, johnson, king & newman can do all 3

cogs & tuck are genuine inside and handle the winning and distribution (jackson & polo maybe)

tambling, deledio, cotchin, morton, brown, tivendale are more the carrying and delivering types

IMO you need 10 genuine mids in a side, and of that they must be a combination of the above, there are no such thing as wingers, hff now they are all resting mids who can rotate through

1 & 2 -Wingers,
3 -Centre,
4 -RRover
5 -Rover
6 -HFF
7 -HFF
3 on interchange

HBF dont count as they are genuine ball carriers with good disposal, at a push you could add them as onballers also and take your total to 12

if you look at the eagles they always rotated cousins, kerr and others off the hff flanks
 
lamb22 said:
My centre square start up would be:

Simmonds Cogs Foley and Jacko

Second rotation

Pattison Polo Raines Tambling

Back ups Tuck & Johnson

Young guns in development mode Connors Edwards Cotchin. Finishers to include Newman and Morton

My Second rotation, if it worked like that, would be Graham, Tuck, Johnson.

I think in a year or two Connors, Cotchin and Edwards will fit there too. I see Tambling as a linkman, half forward, not really an inside midfielder, nor Deledio.
 
I think Connors could be the smokey this year he has aggression good size with plenty of skill not sure about pace but we have plenty of that with Foley Deledio Tambling King etc Connors can also take em on & pull out something special maybe an M Voss in the making with the red nut!! Deledio should be used outside as much as possible to use his blistering pace to break lines & kicking to hit targets.
 
Thats any good and not coming back from 3 years of injury.

He's the only certainty we have. The others are all hope.

Also he's the only one that would walk into any other team in the comp.
 
I'd say Tuck would get a game at quite a few other clubs. If used right (ie winning it and dishing it off to others) he's pretty effective.
 
Newman will never be an inside mid.
He's got good hands but you'd never waste the penetration and accuracy of his kicking on the inside.
He's the perfect person to be on the end of one of those layoffs and putting it down Richo, Browny petts etc throats.
Geez I don't know if I'm just totally one eyed but this thread is making me look forward to 08 more and more.
 
Disco08 said:
I'd say Tuck would get a game at quite a few other clubs. If used right (ie winning it and dishing it off to others) he's pretty effective.

I was probably thinking of A grade quality going into the future but I'll concede half way that he's the only other
inside mid, albeit at best he's B-.
 
Yeah agreed, he wins plenty of it but doesn't use it well enough to be anything more than that.
 
I know he's got plenty of work ahead of him, but where do people see Andrew Collins fitting in, if anywhere? Any chance he could surprise with a senior berth in 2008?