Who is DKing talking about...?

[Freezer]

"A lot of players still have a lot of improvement left and also there are players who aren’t performing to the best of their ability. It’s something those players need to address, otherwise the game will go past them."

http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=42141

Who's he alluding to...?

PBo...? Gas...? Hall...? Petts...? Hartigan...? Hyde...? Krak...? Polo...? Tivva...? Tucky...?

Other...? All...?

 

[johnson2richo2003]

At a guess:
Krak,Hartigan & P.Bo.

The games already past *smile* 2 yrs ago

 

[Scoop]

That is just a stock standard broad statement that all coaches make, singles no one out and each player takes it for what 's it worth to them.

Group therapy in one sentence.

 

[jb03]

Who isn't he talking about?

 

[geoffryprettyboy]

Hall? You gotta be joking.

 

[Freezer]

Hall? You gotta be joking.

Just throwing out some names, Your Prettiness...

 

[geoffryprettyboy]

Hall? You gotta be joking.

Just throwing out some names, Your Prettiness...

I know freezer bag, anyway, just sitting back thinking, while I was refreshing the screen using the mouse with my big toe, we might as well throw in Blingsta.

 

[Freezer]

I think he'd fit into King's "improvement required" list, probably along with the likes of McGuane, Moore, Pattison and *smile*.

 

[geoffryprettyboy]

I think he'd fit into King's "improvement required" list, probably along with the likes of McGuane, Moore, Pattison and *smile*.

Thanks for the confirmation Freezer, for a moment there I thought I was the only one.

 

[Disco08]

I think we all agree he, like all our kids, still has to improve.

Anyone disagree? Anyone think our under 21's are fine at their current levels?

 

[Tubytiger]

I think he'd fit into King's "improvement required" list, probably along with the likes of McGuane, Moore, Pattison and *smile*.

Well, when we get a different game plan then "kick it to Richo" almost every time we go into our forward line for the past upteen years then we can fit into that "improvement". Till then we wont win anything worth while in the larger scheme of things.


There is a mobile forward up in our forward line that continues to present but gets ignored time and time again and people question his ability up forward. Just bemuses me...

 

[skybeau]

There is a mobile forward up in our forward line that continues to present but gets ignored time and time again and people question his ability up forward. Just bemuses me...

Schulz or Patrick Bowden?

Because I thought last week we were bombing it long to Schulz, Richo and four Doggies...completely ignoring Patrick. We were too predictable. The Doggies knew exactly where the ball was coming in to, and could set up the run out of defense too easily. Patrick could've killed them, but we didn't go to him. And he got scapegoated.

At least this week Hughes will provide a third mobile tall option...that's assuming our delivery into the forward 50 and decision making has improved...I'm not holding my breath though.

What WILL be interesting is if we call out Hughes for having a bad game, if he receives the same treatment Pat did...

 

[justice]

There is a mobile forward up in our forward line that continues to present but gets ignored time and time again and people question his ability up forward. Just bemuses me...

Schulz or Patrick Bowden?

Because I thought last week we were bombing it long to Schulz, Richo and four Doggies...completely ignoring Patrick. We were too predictable. The Doggies knew exactly where the ball was coming in to, and could set up the run out of defense too easily. Patrick could've killed them, but we didn't go to him. And he got scapegoated.

At least this week Hughes will provide a third mobile tall option...that's assuming our delivery into the forward 50 and decision making has improved...I'm not holding my breath though.

What WILL be interesting is if we call out Hughes for having a bad game, if he receives the same treatment Pat did...

lol yeh keep sooking mate

hughes will do the business for sure and p-slow can enjoy coburg

 

[Tubytiger]

There is a mobile forward up in our forward line that continues to present but gets ignored time and time again and people question his ability up forward. Just bemuses me...

Schulz or Patrick Bowden?

Because I thought last week we were bombing it long to Schulz, Richo and four Doggies...completely ignoring Patrick. We were too predictable. The Doggies knew exactly where the ball was coming in to, and could set up the run out of defense too easily. Patrick could've killed them, but we didn't go to him. And he got scapegoated.

At least this week Hughes will provide a third mobile tall option...that's assuming our delivery into the forward 50 and decision making has improved...I'm not holding my breath though.

What WILL be interesting is if we call out Hughes for having a bad game, if he receives the same treatment Pat did...

lol yeh keep sooking mate

hughes will do the business for sure and p-slow can enjoy coburg

Not sure who you are confronting of those forwards j - please explain.....

 

[Ruthless Tigers ?]

The sooner Richardson is out of theorward line the sooner we will see long term success and the real skills the young guys have.

A forward line with Hughes, Riewoldt, Schulz and even Kent will be more potent than afoarwardline of Richardson. The guy cant kick and does not provide us with too many options.

 

[tigersforever06]

"A lot of players still have a lot of improvement left and also there are players who aren’t performing to the best of their ability. It’s something those players need to address, otherwise the game will go past them."

http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=42141

Who's he alluding to...?

PBo...? Gas...? Hall...? Petts...? Hartigan...? Hyde...? Krak...? Polo...? Tivva...? Tucky...?

Other...? All...?

2 years to late for Gaspar. Looking that way for Johnson,krakouer as well